The Hadith Conspiracy

The Standard of Hadith Criticisms

2010-05-16T08:21:00.000-07:00

Edited by Zahid Ghadialy from the Book, The life of Muhammad- Haykal

Despite the great care and precision of the hadith scholars, much of what they regarded as true was later proved to be spurious.. In his commentary on the collection of Muslim, al Nawawi wrote: “A number of scholars discovered many hadiths in the collections of Muslim and Bukhari which do not fulfill the conditions of verification assumed by these men.” The collectors attach a greater weight to the trustworthiness of the narrators (a subjective criteria). Their criterion was certainly valuable, but it was not sufficient. In our opinion the criterion for hadith criticisms as well as standard for materials concerning the prophet life, is the one which prophet himself gave. He said: “After I am gone differences will arise among you. Compare whatever is reported to be mine with the book of God; that which agrees therewith you may accept as having come from me; that which disagrees you will reject as fabrication.” The great men of Islam right from the very beginning observe this valid standard. It continues to be the standard of thinkers today. Ibn Khaldun wrote: “I do not believe any hadith or report of a companion of the prophet to be true which differs from the common sense meaning of the Quran, no matter how trustworthy the narrators may have been. It is not impossible that a narrator appears to be trustworthy though he may be moved by ulterior motive. If hadiths were criticized for their textual contents as they were for the narrators who transmitted them, a great number would have been rejected. It is a recognized principle that a hadith could be declared spurious if it departs from the common sense meaning of the Quran from the recognized principles of Shariah, the rules of Logic, the evidence of sense, or any other self-evident truth.” This criterion given by prophet as well as ibn Khaldun, perfectly accords with modern scientific criticsm.

True, after Muhammad’s death the Muslims differed, and they fabricated thousands of hadiths and reports to support their various causes. From the day Abu Luluah, the servant of Mughirah, killed Umar ibn al Khattab and Uthman ibn Affan assumed caliphate, the old pre-Islamic enmity of Banu-Hashim and Banu-Ummayah reappeared. When, upon the murder of Uthman, civil war broke out between the Muslims, Aishah fought against Ali and Ali’s supporters consolidated themselves into a party, the fabrication of Hadiths spread to a point where “Ali ibn Abu Talib himself had to reject the practice and warn against it. He reportedly said: “We have no book and no writing to read except the Quran and this sheet which I have received from the Prophet of God in which he specified the duties prescribed by charity.” Apparently, this exhortation did not stop the hadith narrators from fabricating their stories either in support of a cause they advocated, or of a virtue or practice to which they exhorted the Muslims and which they thought would have more appeal if vested with prophetic authority. When Banu Ummayah firmly established themselves in power, their protagonists among their hadith narrators deprecated the prophetic traditions reported by the party of Ali ibn Abu talib and the later defended these traditions and propagated them with all the means at their disposal. Undoubtedly thy also deprecated the traditions reported by Aishah, “Mother of the Faithful.”

A humorous piece of reportage was given to us by ibn Asakir who wrote: “Abu Sa?d Ismail ibn al Muthanna al Istrabadhi was giving a sermon one day in Damascus when a man stood up and asked him what he thought about the hadith of the prophet: “I am the city of knowledge and Ali is its gate.” Abu Sas pondered the question for a while and then replied: “Indeed! No one knows of this hadith except those who lived in the first century of Islam. What the Prophet had said was rather, I am the city of knowledge; Abu Bakr its foundation; Umar its walls; Uthman its ceiling; and Ali its Gate.” The audience was quite pleased with his reply and asked him to furnish them with the chain of narrators. Abu Sad could not furnish them with the chain of narrators and was embarrassed.” Thus hadiths were fabricated for political and other purposes. This wanton multiplication alarmed the Muslims because many ran counter to the book of God. The attempts to stop this wave of fabrication under the Umawis did not succeed. When the Abbasids took over, and al Mamun assumed the caliphate almost two centuries after the death of the Prophet, the fabricated hadiths numbered in thousands and Hundred of thousands and contained an unimaginable account of contradiction and variety. It was then that the collectors applied themselves to the task of putting the hadiths together and biographers of the prophet wrote his Biography. Al Waqidi, ibn Hisham and Al madaini lived and wrote their books in the days of al Mamun. They could not afford to contradict the caliphate and hence could not apply with the precesion due to
Prophet’s criterion that his traditions ought to be checked against the Quran and accepted only if they accorded therewith.

Had this criterion, which does not differ from the modern and scientific criticism, been applied with precision, the ancient masters would have altered much of their writing. Circumstances of history imposed upon them the application of it to some of their writings and not to others. The later generation inherited their method of treating the biography of the prophet without questioning it. Had they been true to history they would have applied this criterion in general as well as in detail. No reported events disagreeing with the Quran would have been spared, and none would have been confirmed but those that agreed with the book of the God as well as the laws of nature. Even so, these hadiths would have subject to strict analysis and established with valid proofs and incontestable evidence. This stand was taken by the great Muslim scholars of the Past as well as of the present. The grand shaykh of Al Azhar, Muhammad Mustafa al Maraghi, wrote in his foreword to the book, The life of Muhammad by Haykal: “Muhammad- may God’s peace and blessing be on him had only one irresistible miracle: the Quran. But it is not irrational. How eloquent is the verse of al Busayri: God did not try us with anything irrational. Thus, we fell under neither doubt nor illusion.?”

In his book, Al Islam wa al Nasraniyah, Muhammad Abduh, the great scholar and leader wrote: “Islam, therefore, and its demand for faith in God and his unity, depend only on the rational proof and common sense human thinking. Islam does not overwhelm the mind with the supernatural, confuse the understanding with the extraordinary, impose acquiescent silence by resorting to heavenly intervention, nor does it impede the movement of thought by any sudden cry of divinity. All the Muslims are agreed, except those hose opinions are insignificant, that faith in God is prior to faith in prophethood and that it is not possible to believe in the prophet except after one has come to believe in God. It is unreasonable to demand faith in God on the ground that the prophets or the revealed books has said so, for it is unreasonable to believe that any book has been revealed by God unless one already believed that God exists and that it is possible for him to reveal a Book and send a messenger.”

I am inclined to think that those who wrote Biographies of the Prophet agreed with this view. The earlier generation of them could not apply to it because of the historical circumstances in which they lived. The later generation of them suspended the principle deliberately on account of their belief that the more miraculous their portrayal of Prophet, the more faith this would engender among their audience. They assumed, quite naively, that the inclusion of these extraneous matters into his biography achieved a good purpose. Had they lived our day and seen how enemies of Islam had taken their arguments against Islam and its people, they would have followed the Quran more closely and agreed with al Ghazzali, Muhammad Abduh al Maraghi, and all other objective scholars. And had they livd our day and age, and witnessed how their stories have alienated many Muslim minds and hearts instead of confirming their faith, they would have satisfied with the indubitable profs and arguments of the Book of God.

Who Authorized Bukhari?

2009-07-21T11:56:00.000-07:00

By Layth (e-mail: laytth@hotmail.com)

Imam Bukhari (died in 256H/870A.D), was well known for his compilation of Hadith/Sayings attributed to the prophet (peace be upon him). Al-Bukahri is considered by the majority of Muslims to be the 2nd source for Islam after the holy Book and is used by the majority to 'explain' the revelations of the Quran by showing what the prophet and his companions used to do/say.

When GOD says in His book: 'Obey GOD and obey the Messenger', the Muslims take GOD to be represented by the Quran and the Messenger to be represented by Bukhari and the Hadiths.

The prophet (peace be upon him) delivered to us the holy Quran by receiving its inspiration for many years.

"Say, 'Whose testimony is the greatest?' Say, 'GOD's. He is the witness between me and you that this Quran has been inspired to me, to preach it to you and whomever it reaches. Indeed, you bear witness that there are other gods beside GOD.' Say, 'I do not testify as you do; there is only one god, and I disown your idolatry.' (6:19)

Some of the people around the prophet at the time of revelation were very disturbed by the words of the Quran and even asked the prophet to bring them sayings 'other' than the book:

"When our revelations are recited to them, those who do not expect to meet us say, 'Bring a Quran other than this, or change it!' Say, 'I cannot possibly change it on my own. I simply follow what is revealed to me. I fear, if I disobey my Lord, the retribution of an awesome day.' (10:15)

Yet, the prophet could not help these people by changing the words of the Quran to suite their desires...he could only deliver the message as it was inspired to him and to them, for the Quran is a book unlike any other:

"Say: If men and jinn should combine together to bring the like of this Quran, they could not bring the like of it, though some of them were aiders of others. " (17:88)

So, when the people of the time listened to the words 'obey GOD & obey the Messenger', they understood that the words of GOD were being revealed through the person of the Messenger, and that to accept and obey these words was to obey and accept GOD Himself!.

After all, the words of GOD were unlike anything they had heard of before...

"When you read the Quran, we place between you and those who do not believe in the Hereafter an invisible barrier. We place shields around their minds, to prevent them from understanding it, and deafness in their ears. And when you preach your Lord, using the Quran alone, they run away in aversion." (17:45-46)

After the death of the prophet (peace be upon him), the people who had fought his message and the words of GOD saw that this was a 'no win' situation for them, and that the words of GOD would capture the hearts of every believing man and women filling them with justice, equality, tolerance, peace, and freedom.

Yet, even with the spreading of the message, GOD had predicted the inevitable:

"We have permitted the enemies of every prophet - human and alien devils - to inspire to each other fancy words, in order to deceive. Had your Lord willed, they would not have done it. You shall disregard them and their fabrications.This is to let the minds of those who do not believe in the Hereafter listen to such fabrications, and accept them, and thus expose their real convictions. " (6:112-113)

Enter the 'Hadith' collectors and narrators...

These were people who could not be satisfied with the words of GOD Alone and were searching for new gods to replace those that Islam had destroyed.

Bukhari was one such person...

Being born 200 years after the prophet's death (peace be upon him), Bukhari went to perform a task that none of the native Arabs had dared to do...He collected the Hadiths under the guise of 'complementing' the Quran, when in reality his true mission was to undermine and destroy its message with those of his masters!.

Just like Paul (not Jesus) is the father of today's Christianity, so it is that Bukhari (and not the prophet) is the true head of what we call 'Islam' in its present form!.

It is time for Muslims to WAKE-UP and realize that their religion has been hijacked for the last 1,000 years by the enemies of the prophet, and that tyrannical and brutal regimes are a model image of what Bukhari and his colleagues had intended for Islam...They could not destroy the Quran, but they found another way to distort GOD's great message to mankind.

Will we continue to propagate these lies?.

Or will we take a stand against the idols that wish to discredit GOD & His Messenger's words?.

Below is a sample of what GOD's enemies have been propagating:

Narrated Hudayfh Ibn al-Yaman: Prophet said: "There will come rulers after me who do not guide to my guidance and do not practice my Sunnah, and the hearts of some them are the hearts of Satans but they are in the body of human." I said: "What should we do at that time?" Prophet (PBUH) said: "You should just listen to them and obey those rulers. No matter if the hurt you and take your wealth, you should follow them and obey them."

Reference: Sahih Muslim, Chapter of al-Imaarah (chapter 33 for the Arabic version), Section of necessity of joining the majority, 1980 Edition, Arabic version (Saudi Arabia), v3, p1476, Tradition #52.

Beware that our prophet's complaint on judgment day does not include you:

"And the messenger said, 'My Lord, my people have deserted this Quran.' (25:30)

--------
From http://free-minds.org/bukhari

Why the row over the Anti-Hadith but silence over Quran illiteracy?

2009-07-21T11:34:00.000-07:00

"excerpts from "Open Letter To The Nation’s Leaders And Intellectuals" written by Dr. Kassim Ahmad from Malaysia."

The time may have come for us to do a final reckoning with ourselves, our people, and the international community. Never in the history of mankind have we faced such total collapse as we do today.... Where has morality gone? Where on the face of this earth is a group or groups of moral human beings?... There is a limit to human endurance of suffering without protest; that limit has been passed!
When a group of our people in Malaysia wants to bring back the Quran to the hearts of the populace today, this is the significance and the implication. For a thousand years, Muslims have strayed so far away from God’s teachings and lived in such ignorance that they are powerless to destroy the evil perpetrated before their eyes. Western civilization too has strayed far away from the teachings of the prophets, including Moses and Jesus.... Both East and West must return to God’s teachings, particularly the Quran, His final, complete, perfect, and detailed scripture.
Alas, when Jema'ah Al-Quran Malaysia (Quranic Society of Malaysia or JAM) was formed precisely for this mission, a number of our leaders and intellectuals leapt up and protested. "Anti-Hadith group! Anti-Hadith group!" they screamed in accusation. What? Bringing the Quran to the people so that they would understand, this is anti-hadith? So, letting the people remain Quran illiterate, as in the past five hundred years in Malaysia, is acceptable?
I write this open letter to the nation’s leaders and intellectuals in all communities in the hope that we can study this matter calmly and rationally, without hurling accusations and threats and creating an atmosphere of animosity and tension. It is with a sense of responsibility and humility that I ask this, for it is not a matter involving religious ritual, but one of life and death for our people.
In 1986, this writer published a book, Hadis - Satu Penilaian Semula (its English translation, Prophetic Traditions, A Re-evaluation will also be published, God willing) with the intention stated above. Many of the hadith compiled by Bukhari, Muslim and others that we use today, according to this writer’s study, are in conflict with the teachings of the Quran. I give instances in three areas:
One, adulation of or unquestioning acceptance of the teachings of a leader. Since this principle was instilled, Muslims have feared others besides God; they have been afraid to question leaders. Hence they became slaves of the leaders, whereas the Quran exhorts us to free ourselves of all forms of subservience, except to the One God....
Two, prohibiting the use of the rational mind. Generally, Muslims are taught not to use their minds in religious matters. This teaching is spread through some false hadith. Purportedly, the use of the mind in religious matters would lead us astray. If the mind may not be used in religious matters, why may it be used in other matters? Are religious and secular matters to be kept separate? Indeed, this is what has paralyzed the intellects of Muslims in comparison with others. The minds of Muslims have been dead for a thousand years, killed by these false hadith. On the contrary, the teaching of the Quran give the mind a noble place. God deems human beings who do not use their minds worse than animals! (7:179) God bars those who do not use their minds from the fold of the faithful. (10:100)
Three, suppression of creativity. It is evident that for a long time, Muslims have not been creative. Since the thirteenth century when Islamic civilization began to decline, modern scientific discoveries and technological inventions have been made by others, particularly those who hold that human beings may know and may create progress. In the early days, Muslims were highly creative because they adhered to the Quran’s dynamic teachings, which urge Muslims to work and strive for success in this world and the next. But since they turned to the teachings of the hadith, their creativity declined, for these false hadith teach resignation to taqdir (divine pre-destination) or fatalism. Purportedly, good and evil are from God. The Malay proverb, "If you are fated to gain a cupak (a small measure of rice) you will not gain a gantang (a big measure of rice)," reflects this world-view.
All three teachings from certain false hadith are clearly in conflict with teachings in the Quran. The Islamic education system from the village pondok (rural religious seminary) right up to the Azhar university, based on rote learning and unquestioning acceptance, teaches that hadith cannot possibly be in conflict with the Quran. This would be true of hadith that are really from the Prophet. But history tells us that the hadith compilations by Bukhari and others were made between 200 and 250 years after the Prophet’s death. These compilations are the responsibility of Bukhari and others, not of the Prophet. The Prophet’s responsibility as God’s messenger was to convey the Quran....
Some religious leaders label as apostates those who adhere to the Quran, accusing them of being anti-hadith. According to certain hadith, apostates are punished by being put to death. Are they not aware that leaders of Christian Church during the Middle Ages in Europe also put to death apostates from Christianity? Thus, this is not punishment under God’s law, but one from the age of ignorance which entered the hadith through the Torah (Old Testament), which had been tampered with. (Refer to Deut. 13:5-10) Do our people know that according to the teachings of the Quran, one is given full freedom to choose one's religion? Thus, killing someone for religion is totally forbidden by God and is a great sin.
The study of the hadith has been developed into a complex one in Islam from the 9th to the 15th century. The early hadith scholars established a method of sifting out the weak hadith and retaining only the genuine ones. However, we must realize that knowledge develops, and one of the conditions for development is freedom to criticize. No philosopher, scientist or scholar is free of weaknesses, and one of the ways of overcoming weaknesses is through scientific criticism. We have seen the weaknesses of the method used by the early hadith scholars in the existence of many hadith which are in conflict with the Quran in Sahih Bukhari (Bukhari’s compilation of hadith that are regarded as genuine) and others.
Now we need to review the definition of sahih or authentic hadith. Does it mean confirmed as genuine only on the basis of isnad (chain of narrators) or also on the basis of matan (meaning of text)? Between isnad and matan, which is the more important? As we are talking about the sayings and doings of the Prophet, the term sahih must be based on matan which is in line with the Quran, for the sayings and doings of the Prophet Muhammad could not possibly be in conflict with the teaching of the Quran.
It is clear why we need to do a re-evaluation. Every Muslim believes in the Quran and puts it above all other teachings. Our problem is the Quran-illiteracy of Muslims whose language is not Arabic, and of Arab Muslims whose language is Arabic. They do not know which of the hadith taught to them are in conflict with the teachings of the Quran and which are not. Many false teachings have been slipped into the hadith by foes of Islam in those days (the Jews, the Christians, the Persians) to undermine Islam from within. If Muslims wish to be great again, and surely they do wish it, re-evaluating the hadith on the basis of the Quran and understanding and practicing the teachings of the Quran are unavoidable conditions.
Certainly, when this re-evaluation is carried out, certain changes and adjustments will need to be made in our beliefs and practices. As these changes are made to correct and improve, we need not fear making them. In fact, we should welcome them. What we should fear is going on practicing wrong traditions after knowing them to be so.
But these few changes and adjustments involve major matters:
One, we must reject adulation of leaders. We must bow only to God. All human beings are equal--none higher or lower than the other. This will rekindle the spirit of jihad (struggling in God’s cause) among Muslims....
Two, we must reject taqlid (un-questioning acceptance of human authority). We must use our minds to gain knowledge. We read all books, but critically. We learn from all teachers, but without forgetting our critical faculty. In this way, we shall inherit only the good from our ancestors; the bad we shall cast aside. Thus will the Islamic intellect blossom again.
Three, we must reject fatalism. Our fates as individuals and as a nation is shaped by ourselves, not by taqdir (divine predestination). The law is: those who strive will attain; those who do not strive will not. Man cannot know his capacity until he tries. The Omniscient God knows everything from beginning to end, but man does not know what God knows. This change will revive the creativity of Muslims; and science, philosophy, art and technology will bloom again in the Islamic world.
These are the three major changes we must make as individuals and as a people when we re-evaluate the hadith on the basis of the Quran and when we return to the Quran. Is this impossible? I think not. The best ways of making these changes can be discussed and decided by our leaders and intellectuals.
As we have seen, the anti-hadith allegations hurled at us are the result of ignorance or misunderstanding on the part of the people and a handful of leaders who fear for their position and authority. These can be overcome through sincere and fair discussion. We all declare ourselves to be Muslims. What, then, prevents us from holding talks to find an amicable solution based on truth? If both sides are sincere, adhere to the spirit of brotherhood among the faithful, and base the talks on the Quran, as God commands, there is no reason why we cannot solve this problem.
We have no intention of toppling the ulama (religious scholars or leaders) or wresting away their positions. We only want the Muslims, including the leaders and the intellectuals, in our country to adhere truly to the Quran.
Some claim that this problem need not be re-opened as it was solved long ago. These people are like ostriches, burying their heads in the sand and saying there is nothing to worry about since they can see nothing! Islamic communities all over the world as well as in our country are bogged down with problems they cannot overcome. Why? Because we live in darkness. How could we see in the dark? We need to get out of the darkness by using a bright torch. That torch is the Quran.
As I stated in the beginning of this letter, the time has come for Muslims and mankind in general to return to God’s teachings. Our society, both national and international, is hit by crisis after crisis; the only way we can overcome these is by returning to the teachings of the Omniscient God, i.e., the Quran. Such is the importance of the Quran to us and to the world.

Conspiracy Against the Quranic Text

2009-07-21T11:21:00.000-07:00

Chapter From the book "Conspiracies against the Qur'an" by Dr. Sayed Abdul Wadud)

"Nay but it (the Quran) is indeed a message of instruction. Therefore let whoso will, keep it in rememberance that it is in papers held in great honour, exalted (in dignity), kept pure and holy, (written) by the hands of scribes, honourable, pious and just." (80:11-16)

"It is for us to assemble it and to promulgate it. And when we have promulgated it, follow thou its recital (as promulgated). Nay more, it is for us to explain it." (75:17-19)

"We have without doubt, sent down the message and We will assuredly guard it (from corruption.)" (15:9)

"Or do they say, 'he has forged it'? Say: "Bring then a Sura like unto it, or call (to your aid) any one you can, besides God, if you are truthful." (10:38)

Certain aspects of the conspiracies against the Quran described in the previous pages require further elucidation in the light of the Quranic teachings. One such conspiracy, as stated earlier, was about the very words of the Quran. This was an attempt to shake the Muslim belief that the words of the Quran and their sequence remained unchanged since they were revealed to the last messenger of God. Thus a propaganda was let loose to the effect that Muhammad did not leave the Quran with his followers in its present form and that the words of the Quran have been changing during the first century A.H.: and that some of the verses which were originally present in the Quran are no more there; and that some of the verses that are now present in the Quranic text, have been abrogated: and that because Muhammad himself did not know reading and writing it is not certain if the scribes, to whom he dictated, took notes correctly.

The basis of the Islamic social order, is the conviction that the code of life we received through Muhammad and which was meant to channelise the human activities in the right direction, is from God and God alone. A slight deviation from this belief razes the whole structure of the Islamic social order to ground. We Muslims, also believe that revelation came to Moses and Jesus Christ, the messengers of God, which basically brought the same message as is given in the Quran; On the other hand, we believe that the Quran remains absolutely unaltered. From beginning to end, it is exactly the same as it was revealed to Muhammad. If any-body has the slightest doubt about it, it no more remains the basis of 'Deen' (the Islamic social order) with him. Thus the conspiracy to create doubts about the Quranic words and their sequence was most pernicious. Let us recall our earlier statement that the non-Arab nations, who inspite of their overwhelming material superiority could not stand against the Arabian Muslims in the battle-field, decided to change their strategy. They apparently came into the fold of Islam but in fact they used their conversion as a means to shake Muslim conviction in the Quranic truth. Thus they succeeded in introducing a belief that 'Deen' (Islamic social order) is contained not only inside the Quran but also outside it. So it became easy to change the entire concept of the basic teachings of the Quran. They took advantage of the Muslim's love and devotion to their Rasool and introduced the idea that the Ahadis attributed to him are at par with the Quran. Having done that, they based the information regarding the sequence and the mode of assemblage of the Quranic verses on Ahadis. This paved the way to forge statements about the Quranic words and their sequence, although Allah took upon Himself the safety of the Quran.

Now let us examine dispassionately if it is possible to hold such Ahadis as genuine. We shall first describe the relevant Ahadis and then examine in the light of the Quran how far these are true. There is a book entitled "Kitab al Masahif" , written by Hafiz Abu Bakr Abdullah Ibne-Abi Daud Suleman Ibe-e-Ashat Sajistani, in which all traditions dealing with the compilation of the Quran are collected. This is used as a standard book of reference in this respect. The Ahadis quoted below are taken from this book.

(Contradictory and fictitious traditions about the subject)

That the Quran was compiled not by the Rasool himself but by Zaid Bin Sabit under instructions from Hazart Abu Bakr Siddiq:

Tradition (1) Imam Ibn Abi Daood relates from Zaid Bin Sabit, on his own authority - When Ahl-e-Yammama were murdered in large number s Abu Bakr Siddiq (1st caliph) sent for me (Zaid). Omar was also there. Abu Bakr Siddique said that Qarees (those who learn Quran by heart) have been murdered in an enormously large number and it is feared that the Quran shall become extinct. I would advise that the Quran be compiled early. I replied that how could I do a thing which the Rasool himself did not do. But they continued insisting upon it till I agreed. Thus I began a search for the Quranic verses written on places of paper, on stones, on dried leaves of date-palm and also searched for those people who had learnt it by heart, until only one verse, which the Rasool often used to recite, was left and that was also found later.

Tradition (2) Imam Ibn Abi Daood relates from Urwa Ibn Zubair, on his own authority, that when a large number of Q'areez were murdered, Abu Bakr Siddiq feared the loss of the Quran. He thus asked Omar and Zaud bin Sabit to sit at the door of the mosque and collect the Quranic verses from anybody who could produce two witnesses each in support their being genuine.

Tradition (3) Imam Ibn Abi Daood relates from Abd Khair, on his own authority, that he heard Hazrat Ali saying that blessed be Abu Bakr Siddiq who assembled the Quranic verses.

The Quran was assembled by Abu Bakr Siddiq himself and Zaid Bin S'abit had only a second reading on it:

Tradition (4) Imam Ibn Abi Daood, relates from S'alam and Kharja, on his own authority, that Abu Bakr Siddiq had assembled the Quran on papers himself and had requested Zaid Bin S'abit to have a second reading on it. Zaid refused but he agreed on the insistence of Omar. The scriptures thus compiled remained with Hazart Abu Bakr Siddiq till his death, the possession being succeeded by Omar till he died, and again by Hafsa (wife of the Rasool and daughter of Omar). Osman, when he became Caliph, sent for the scriptures but Hafsa first refused to part with but later agreed on the promise that they shall be returned to her. Thus Osman returned the scriptures after he got them copied. These remained with Hafsa until Marwan, in his time, got them burnt.

The compilation of the Quran started by Hazrat Omar (not by Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq) and completed by Osman (III Caliph).

Tradition (5) Imam Ibn Abi Daood relates from Yahya bin Abdur Rahman bin Hatab that Omar (II Caliph), determined to assemble the Quran, ordered all those who kept with them the Quranic verses which were earlier collected by them from the Rasool, to produce such verses before him based on evidence of two witnesses each. Thus he gathered all those pieces of papers, stones, wooden plates and date-palm leaves on which the Quran was written. Omar left the task of compilation of the Quran incomplete when he died and it was thus taken over by Osman (III Caliph) who followed the routine of his predecessor. During this period Khazima Ibn S'abit challenged Osman that he had missed two verses and these were ultimately taken over.

Alleged Differences on the Quranic Text during the Caliphate of Osman-

Tradition (6) Imam Ibn Abi Daood relates from Yazdi bi Moaviya, on his own authority, a story that Abu Musa Ash ari and Abdulla bin Masood read the following Quranic verse diffenently - One reading as "wa atimu ul hajja wal umrata lil bayt" and the other reading as "wa atimu ul hajja wal umrata lilah" (2:196)

Abdulla Bin Masood disagreed with the appointment of Zaid bin S'abit as the scribe of the Quran.

Tradition (7) Imam Ibn Abi Daood relates from Ibrahim Nakhie, on his own authority that Osman ordered the destruction of all Quranic versions except his own. On this Abdullah bin Masood said, "O people! Hide the versions of the Quran that you posess because any-body who hides it, shall bring it along with him on the day of judgemnet."

Tradition (8) Imam Ibn Abi Daood relates from Abdulla bin Atba that Abdulla bin Masood disagreed with the appointment of Zaid bin S'abit as the scribe of the Quran and said, "O believers! I am being kept away from the task of scribing the Quranic text and this responsibility is entrusted to a person who was not even born to his infidel father at the time of my coming into the fold of Islam.

Just imagine the type of behaviour attributed to the companions of the Rasool whom the Quran describes as "rahuma-u-baynahum" (48:29) kind and affectionate towards one another.

Tradition (9) Imam Ibn Daood relates from Ibn Shahab Zahri in conjunction with Ans Ibn Malik Ansari that when Syrian and Iraqi Muslims met each other in the battle of Azarbijan and Armenia, differences arose in the respective versions of the Quranic text that the two people rehearsed and there was a danger of conflict between them. Hazifa Ibn Aliman Informed Caliph Osman that he heard that differences are likely to arise amongst the Muslims, regarding the Quranic text, like the ones present amongst the Jews and Christians regarding their own scriptures. Osman got perturbed over it and sent for the script which was written by Zaid bin S'abit under instructions from Abu Bakr Siddiq and got it copied for circulation in various parts of the country. But when Marwan became the chief of Madina, he sent for the same script from Hafsa with the intention of burning it so as to avoid differences amongst the Muslims. Hafsa refused to hand over but the task of burning was completed after the death of Hafsa.

How was the Quran compiled during the days of Caliph Osman

Tradition (10) Imam Ibn Abi Daood relates, on his own authority, from Ayub who related from Abu Qalaba, that during the period of caliphate of Osman teachers of Quran differed from each other in the Quranic text, and the differences were thus carried to the pupils, so much so that Muslims began to call each other infidels on account of these differences. Osman warned them against this practice and advised them to unite on one version. Thus on very difference that arose, Osman often sent for a certain person who, he remembered, had collected the disputed verse from the Rasool directly. And on occasions, when such a person was away at some far off place, Osman noted the preceding and the following verses, leaving blank space for the disputed verse, which was filled up on his arrival. After the task was completed. Osman ordered the destruction of all other versions except the one compiled by himself.

The readers may please keep an eye on the contradictory statements and the suspicions that are being created, one after the other, regarding the Quranic text.

Tradition (11) Imam Ibn Abi Daood relates from Masaab Ibn Saad, on his own authority, that Osman felt concerned on the people expressing doubts on the Quranic text only after 13 years of the death of the Rasool. He thus ordered them to braing to him all that they possessed regarding the Quran. They brought pieces of papers and hides on which the Quran was written. After the lot was collected. Osman sat inside inviting men individually, each stating each stating on oath that the material produced by him was the one collected by him from the Rasool directly. After the completion of this task, he enquired as to who was the best scribe amongst them and who was the person who knew the Arabic language best? They named Zaid bin S'abit and Saeed bin 'Aas respectively. Osman, thus, ordered Saeed to dictate and Zaid to write it down. This completed version of the Quran was criculated amongst the people.

The sequence of the Quranic verses was set by Osman.

Tradition (12) Imam Ibn Daood Relates from Ibn Abbas, on his own authority that he pointed out to Osman as to why did he place Sura 'Baraat' with Sura 'Anfal'. Osman replied that he thought Sura 'baraat' was a part of Sura 'Anfal', and that is why he (Ibn Abbas) did not point it out during the life time of the Rasool that it was not a part of Sura 'Anfal'.

Tradition (13) Imam Ibn Abi Daood relates from Abdul A'ala bin Abdulla bin Abdulla bin 'Aamir Qarshi, on his own authority, that after the script was completed Osman complemented his people by saying, "You have done well but there are some linguistic mistakes left but these the Arabs can correct themselves."

How fantastic that even after this some mistakes were left which Osman ignored.

Tradition (14) Imam Ibn Abi Daood relates from 'Akrama Tai, in his own authority, that when the script, after compilation, was brought before Osman, he noticed certain mistakes in it and remarked that if the one who dictated was from Banu Hanzil tribe and the scribe was from Banu Saqif tribe, these mistakes would not have occurred.

Tradition (15) It is related from Saeed Ibn Jabeer that there are four words which are not correct in the Quran:

1- "As-sabi-oona" (5:69) 2- "wal muqeemina" (4:62) 3- "fa assadaqa wa akun min as saliheen" (63:10) 4- "inna hazzane la sahiraane" (20:13)

Tradition (16) Urwa said that when he pointed out to Hazrat Aisha (Wife of the Rasool) about the four mistakes pointed out above, she replied, "My nephew! It is the scribes who made these mistakes."

Tradition (17) Zubair Ibn Khalid asked Aban Ibn Osman about certain verse and he replied that it had been wrongly written by te scribes.

Tradition (18) Khalid Ibn Ays bin Sakhra Abi Aljaham relates that he read the script compiled by Osman and pointed out to him that it differs from the scripts possessed by the people of Madina at 12 different points. In order to remove this difficulty Osman got prepared copies of his own version for distribution, but this also could not serve the purpose because as Imam Ibn Abi Daood has mentioned, on his own authority, that even the scripts which were copied for despatching to different cities were different from each other at several hundred points. Not even that, Imam Ibn Abi Daood points out that these differences were present not only during the lifetime of the Rasool but even after that and that the present script of the Quran is the one finally corrected by Hajaj Ibn Yousaf who made amendments in Osman's script at eleven places.

In short, these traditions tell us that the present version of the Quran that we possess today was neither compiled by the Rasool nor by his companions but it is the one finally amended by Hajaj Ibn Yousuf about a century after the death of the Rasool. This was the period when traditions began to be recorded. The crux of the whole matter is that the conspiracy wants to assert that the Quranic text and the Ahadis are both at par with each other, as far as their care, recording and finalisation is concerned, and if the purity and authenticty of the traditions is doubtful, the same may be said about the Quranic text. The conspiracy wants to impress that the present Quranic text is not the one dictated by the Rasool himself but, rather, it is the one finally corrected by Hajaj Ibn Yousaf.

This is only a brief extract from the book "Kitab al Masahif" written by Abu Bakr Abdullah Ibn Abi Daood of Baghdad (230-316 A.H.) who was held in great esteem by the traditionalists, the people and the Government of Baghdad. How far the traditions quoted above vary and contradict each other is apparent. That the Quran was compiled by Zaid bin S'abit under instructions from Abu Bakr siddiq (1st Caliph); that Abu Bakr Siddiq assembled himself and Zaid bin S'abit had a second look over it; that the assemblage of te Quran was started by Omar (II Caliph) and completed by Osman (III Caliph); that it was assembled during the caliphate of Osman only, by Zaid bin S'abit; that the sequence of the Quranic verses was arranged by Osman himself and so on.

All these self-contradictory traditions are attributed to the companions of the Rasool who, according to the Quran, were the most truthful people. One can well imagine the poison these traditions can inject into the minds of the readers against the Quran and how much suspicion they can raise against its purity and integrity. If such traditions are relied upon there is no difference left between the Quran and the present versions of torah and Bible which we believe are not in their original forms as revealed to Moses and Jesus Christ respectively. On the basis of these traditions, the non-Muslim Orientalists ask us today to explain as to how could the Quran be called a safe and unaltered book. Thus a learrned orientalist, Arthur Jaffery has collected all such diverse and contradictory traditions regarding the compilation of the Quran in his book entitled, Material for the History of the text of the Quran. He has particularly mentioned that it may not be taken in the spirit that his book has been compiled by a non-Muslim. The authority for it, he said, is no less than the famous book "Kitab al Masahif". Thus he has tried to challenge our claim that the Quran we possess today is exactly the same that was revealed to Muhammad.

This particular conspiracy against the Quran by the non-Arabs is very unfortunate indeed but fortunately the Quran itself stands as a witness against it and is sufficient by itself to explode the myth of this conspiracy. Still more unfortunate is the fact that our Mulla is holding these traditions as a sacred trust. When it is said that such traditions cannot form part of the basis of our 'Deen' because they were not given to Muslims by the Rasool, in the form of a safely compiled book, the reply comes from Mulla that the same is the case with the Quran, so that the Ahadis and the Quran are at par with each other as far as their safety and integrity is concerned. But, on the other hand, the verses of the Quran are so explicit, so logical and so dynamic that no argument by Mulla or anybody else can stand against it.

Now let us examine how far the Quran itself throws light on the subject under discussion-

The Quran has laid great stress on writing. The permanent records of speech can be kept only in a written form because the spoken words when uttered are lost for ever like the breath which carried them. As the divine message was to spread far and wide through time and space, and the message was not carried to individual human beings, written speech formed the nucleus for te spread of human knowledge and even by other messengers of God long before him. How much emphasis the Quran laid on writing is apparent from the fact that the very first revelation the came to Muhammad was in the following words:

"Proclaim that your sustainer is the bestower of greatness; He Who taught the
use of Pen; taught man that which he knew not." (96:3-5)

Again it is said:

"We bring into evidence the pen and that which they write." (68:1)

How much importance the Quran gave to writing and how freely the writing of documents was in practice during the period of quranic revelation is apparent from the following verse;

"O you who believel when you deal with each other in transactions involving future obligations in a fixed period of time, reduce them to writing." (2:282)

It is further said in the same verse:

"Disdain not to reduce in writing (you contract) for a specific period, whether it be small or big." (2:282)

It can readily be inferred from the above that when it is not allowed to leave in doubt the matters related to ordinary mutual transactions, how could the writing of the Quran, the final message for the guidance of mankind, be ignored. That is why the first revelation that came to Muhammad impressed upon him the importance of reducing the verbal message into writing.

About the non-believers the Quran says:

"Or is it that the unseen is in their hands, so that they can write it down." (68:47)

The verse points out that the unseen is not within the knowledge of non-believers otherwise they could have written it down for their own guidance or for the guidance of others, as was being done in the case of Quran.

Secondly it is far from expectation that Muhammad did not learn writing after the first revelation instructed him to do so. In fact it is clear from the verse that follows that he remained unlettered only as long as the revelation did not come to him:

qablihi min kita_biw wa la_ tahut tuhu_ biyaminika izal lar ta_bal mubtilu_n

"And you were not able to recite a book before this (revelation), nor were you able to transcribe one with your right hand: in that case indeed those who follow falsehood have doubted." (29:48)

The word in this verse is significant which means "before this revelation came." Thus the Quran has put the record straight that Muhammad could read and write after the start of revelation.

Next comes the Quranic evidence that Muhammad himself used to write the revealed verses which he then dictated to others. Thus it is said:

ak tatabaha_ fahiya tumla_ alaihi bukrataw wa asila

"And they (non-believers) say (these are) the tales of the ancients which he (Muhammad) has written down and which are dictated before him morning and evening." (25:5)

Here the word "aktatab" is significant which means "to take notes especially when a second person is dictating."

Moreover the practice of keeping written records of revelation started centuries before the Quran was revealed. To reduce the verbal divine message into writing was not a new thing to start with.

Thus the Quran says:

"Mankind was one single nation and God sent messengers with glad tiding and warnings and with them He sent the book in truth, to judge between people in matters they differed." (2:213)

"We sent our messengers with clear signs and sent down with them the book and the balance." (57:25)

"And when there came to them a messenger from God confirming what was with them, a party of the people of the book, threw away the book of God (Quran) behind their backs, as if it had been something they did not know." (2:101)

The holy Quran has used the word 'book' for itself at so many places. Scattered written sheets of paper are never called a book. A book is a treatise written on a number of sheets which are fastened together. After 'Sura Fateha' the opening chapter, the Quranic text begins with the following verse-

"Here is the book, in it there is no ambiguity, uncertainty or psychological complex. It is a guidance to those who save themselves from the consequences of going against the Divine laws." (2:1)

At hundreds of other places the Quran has called itself a book in different contexts. The Quran is a book which is a collection of various "Sura" chapters. Thus in support of the truth contained therein, the Quran challenges the vain-glorious opponents of Muhammad who doubted the revelation of the Quran and said that he (Muhammad) composed the verses himself, in the following words:

'Or do they say, "He forged it"? Say: "Bring then a Sura like onto it." (10:38)

"Or they may say, "He forged it". Say, "Bring you then ten Suras forged like unto it." (11:13)

Again it is repeated:

""Say: "If the whole of mankind both civilised and uncivilised were to gather together to produce the like of this Quran, they could not produce the like thereof, even if they backed up each other with help and support." (17:88)

Thus the whole world is challenged to produce a book like this and it has not been able to produce one. Its beauty, standard and purity is a proof by itself that it is a book revealed by Allah and compiled by one to whom it was revealed.

The Quran is a book which was not only written but also rehearsed side by side with its gradual descent. Thus it is said:

"Recite from the book what has been revealed to you." (29:45)

"And recite (and teach) what has been revealed to thee of the book of thy Rabb: None can change His words." (18:27)

But in spite of all this, when the non-believers persisted in their opposition to the Quran, they were questioned in the following words:

"Is it not enough for them that We have sent down to thee the book which is rehearsed to them?" (29:51)

Again it is said:

"Or have you a book through which you learn?" (68:37)

It clearly indicates that Quran is a book which was written and compiled side by side with its revelation and that Muhammad and his companions used to read the book. The non-believers were asked whether they also get a revelation like this and whether they also write it down and then rehearse as is done by Muhammad and his companions. This also indicates that the verses of the book had a regular order and sequence, so thay could be rehearsed by the Rasool and his followers.

The Quran was composed in the from of a book which was absolutely safe from corruption and invention:

"Furthermore I call to witness the location of the heavenly bodies and that indeed is a mighty witness if you but know that this is indeed the Quran, which benefits humanity by raising its stature without lowering its dignity, in a book well guarded which none shall touch (or be benefited) but those who are clean (in body, mind, thought and attention); a revelation from the Sustainer of the universe." (56:75-80)

The sociological laws given to mankind through the messengers of God are the reflections of the fundamental laws that govern the organization of all matter at all levels which indicates that the law-giving authority is One. The stars follow courses, exactly computed, which are controlled by laws that are immutable.

So are the laws contained in the holy Quran for the guidance of mankind immutable, and if followed, produce results which never change. Thus the Quran is preserved in the form of a book which lies absolutely safe since it was revealed. But only those people can be benefited by it who have a clean and unbiased mind, free from prejudice and fixed notions.

Material used by Muhammad for writing the Quran-

The Quran points out that the book, the exactness of which is compared above with the controlled movement of the stars, was recorded by Muhammad and his companions, not on places of stones, nor on date-palm leaves, nor on pices of bones but on parchment paper.

In the verses given below five things are produced as a witness to support the truth that the way of life followed by non-believers shall bring destruction, and one of these five things is the Quran written on parchment scroll. Thus it is said:

Wa kita_bim mastu_r Fir raq qim manshu_r Wal baitil ma mu_r Was saqfil marfu_Wal bahril masju_r In na aza_ba rab bika lawa_qi

"By the mount (of Revelation), by the book inscribed on parchment unfolded, by the much-frequented house (Kaba), by the canopy of outer space raised high, by the ocean filled with swell; Verity, the doom of thy Lord will indeed come to pass." (52:1-7)

So far we have learnt from the verses described above that the Quran was present with Muhammad in the form of a written book, in a specific order and sequence, and that is was written on a parchment scroll.

The holy Quran describes further the distinctive marks of the scribes who used to write the Quran in the presence of Muhammad. Thus it is said:

"Look! This Quran is indeed a message of instruction, therefore let whoso will keep it in remembrance that it is in papers held in great honour, exalted (in dignity), kept pure and holy, (written) by the hands of scribes, honourable, pious and just." (80:11-16)

It is abundantly clear from the above verses that the Quran was dictated, as soon as it is was revealed to Muhammad, to the scribes who were honourable, pious and just. Thus the question of any addition, alteration or invention does not arise. This process of dictation, from the original text kept by Muhammad himself, continued day and night. How could it be possible, otherwise, for a book to remain a code of life for all future generations of mankind.

The practice of learning the Quran by heart was prevalent during the days of Muhammad and still continues from the last 14 centuries:-

We learn from the above description that the Quran laid great stress on writing and that the Rasool and his companions were devoted to the practice of recording the revealed message. But if we cast a glance at the history of the world and the revolution that took place in the past, we learn how the great treasures of knowledge had been destroyed. The Christians had the Bible in written form. The Jews took pain keep the Torah well protected, so much so that a copy if it was kept locked up in a box which was held in great honour. But the invasion of Bakht Nasr and the onslaught of Romans deprived both the people of their sacred books for ever. Similarly the great Egyptian civilization was razed to the ground by the Greeks. Thus even to keep the record of knowledge in written form is not enough. It becomes still more safe if certain thing is also learned by heart in succession. Both these safeguards for the preservation of knowledge, combined together, assure the greatest measure of safety.

We noticed above the measures adopted by the Rasool and his companions for keeping the written record of the Quran. Now let us turn the other aspect i.e. the learning of the Quran by heart. The Rasool was intructed, in the very begining of the period of revelation, in the following words:

"O the creature of harmony and single mindedness in the ranks of your followers! Stand (to prayer) by night, but not all night; half of it or a little less, or a little more and recite the Quran in slow well arranged and integrated stages (so as to enable your companions to follow closely its sequences, deep meaning, significance, beauty proportion.)" (73:1-4)

Though it was the Rasool who was given this instruction in particular, in fact it was meant for the whole Muslim community who faithfully followed this practice. But as the volume of the Quranic text gradully increased and at the same time the responsibilities for the establishment and maintenance of Islamic Social Order increased, it was no longer possible to recite the whole of the Quran every night. So the Divine instructions for the recitation of the Quran were modified. Thus it is said in the last verses of the above -said chapter:

"Your Cherisher and Sustainer knows that you stand forth (to prayer) nigh two - thirds of the night, or half the night, or a third of the night and so does a party of your companions. But Allah apoints the measures of day and night, and he knows that you are unable to keep count thereof. So He has turned to you (in benevolence): read you, therefore, of the Quran as much as may be easy for you." (73:20)

But history tells us that the practice of recitation of the whole of the Quran in one night continued and stills continues especially during the holy month of Ramazan. The result is that the learning of the Quran by heart has remained the practice amongst the Muslims for the last fourteen centuries. The number of 'Haffaz' (those who learned the Quran by heart) has been and is by no means small in every part of the Muslim population all over the wold. Thus it is said:

"Nay, this Quran is a collection of explicit verses contained in the hearts of those endowed with knowledge." (29:49)

There is yet another aspect of the Quran worth mentioning. The sequence of the Quranic verses and their assemblage in the form of a book were instructed by Allah by means of revelation:

"Move not thy tongue (concerning the Quran) to make haste therewith. (Rest assure) it is for Us to assemble it and to promulgate it. And when We hve promulgated it, follow thou its recital (as promulgated). Nay more, it is for Us to explain it (and make it clear)." (75:16-19)

Here it is impressed upon the Rasool not to be impatient in reciting a message before the revelation is firmly grasped by him, because Allah took upon Himself the collection, the correct recital and the explanation of the Quran.

Now let us recount the facts gathered so far, from the Quran itself, regarding the safety of the Quran-

1. In the very first revelation to Muhammed, the importance of writing was impressed upon him, as a written document is much more authentic and beyond suspicion.

2. Muhammed remained unlettered only till the time revelation came to him.

3. After the start of revelation, Muhammed used to dictate the revealed verses to his companions immediately after they were revealed and this become a regular practice.

4. The Quran has called itself a book at scores of places and it is apparent that scattered leaves are not called a book.

5. The Quran is a collection of various chapters.

6. The copies of Quran were present with the Muslims during the lifeime of Muhammed and they used to read it by sight.

7. The material used for writing the Quran was large pieces of unfolded parchment.* (i)

8. The scribes to whom the Rasool dictated the Quranic verses were most honourable, and pious men of great integrity.

9. The Rasool and his companions used to recite the whole Quran every night which indicates that the words of the Quran had a regular sequence.

10. Men and woman learnt the Quran by heart and thus it was safety preserved in the memory of a vast number of Muslims during the lifetime of the Rasool.

11. Allah took upon Himself the assemblage, the correct recital and the explanation of the Quranic verses, by presenting a subject in various ways and different contexts.

Then comes the great proclamation:

"We have, without doubt, sent down the message and We will assuredly guard it (from corruption)." (15:9)

Again it is said:

<..wa in nahu_ lakita_bun aziz-La_ yatihil ba_tilu mim baini yasaihi wa la_ min khalif tanzilum min hakimin hamid

"..Indeed it is a book of exalted power (whose prescribed way of life is bound to dominate). No falsehood can approach it, from before or behind it (i.e., openly or secretly). It is sent down by One full of wisdom and worthy of praise." (41:41-42)

Thus the Quranic text has been guarded eternally from corruptions, inventions and accretions, even if the whole world is bent upon destroying it.

The Quran as viewed by non-Muslim Historians-

It is an established fact that the Quran which we processes today is exactly what was revealed to the last messenger of God, Muhammed. This view is held not only by those who believe in the Quran but also by those who have scrutinised this aspect of the Quran purely from the research point of view. The famous orientalist Caroness Margaret Von Strein writes:-

"Though all the Divine scriptures were revealed by God yet the Quran is the only scripture which has not undergone even the slightest alteration and is safe in its original form."

Hortwig Horchfeld writes in his book entitled: New Researches into the Composition and Exegeses of the Quran-

"The research workers of the modern age agree on the point that the present version of the Quran is the exact copy if the original script which was written by Zaid Bin Sabit abd its text is exactly the same as was given by Muhammed".

It is stated Encyclopedia Britannica, under the heading of Quran:-

"All efforts of the European research workers to prove later additions in the Quranic text have proved absolutely futile."

Sir William Muir writes in his book titled, Life of Muhammed:-

"Otherwise all sorts of external and internal evidence in there to prove that we have exactly the same Quranic text which Muhammed gave (to his followers) and used himself."

That the Quran remained absolutely safe and unaltered, since it was revealed, is thus a proved fact admitted even by the non-Muslim research scholars.

Above-described is the direct evidence in support of the safety of the Quran, from the Quran itself and also the views of the non-Muslim research workers.

The characteristics of the Quran as a Book-

Next we shall describe some of the verses in which the Quran calls itself a 'book'. The object being to illustrate the various characteristics of the book and the degree of its excellence, so that a reader may be able to judge himself, whether a book of this calibre which was to serve as a guide to mankind for all times to come, could be in a uncared for on pieces of stones, bones and leaves etc., without being complied in a regualr and orderly manner by one who was not its recipient but also a deliverer and whose responsibility also included the establishment of a social order subject to the Divine message. Thus it is said:

"This Quran is not such as can ever be originated by anybody other than Allah; But it is a confirmation of (revelations) that went before it, and is a detailed code wherein there is no doubt that is from the sustainer of the worlds." (10:37)

<Tanzilul kita_bi la_ raiba fihi mir rab bil a_lamin. Am yaqu_lu_naf tara_r bal huwal haq qu mir rab bika litunzira qaumam ma_ ata_hum min nazirim min qablika la al lahum yahtadu_n

"This is the gradual and systematic descent of the book in which there is no doubt that it is from the One Who brings up the universe from the point of its origin to the point of its final destination. Or will they say, "He (Muhammad) has forged it? Nay it is the finally established truth from the sustainer." (32:2-3)

The word "Tanzeel" in the verse significant. It means to place things in an orderly manner and in appropriate place respectively. It indicates that revelation of the Quran is not a subjective thing. It is not the product of Rasool's brain. But it was given to him objectively. It is not a thing that was discovered but, on the other hand, it was revealed. The word "Tanzeel" has occurred at so many other places in the Quran. As for example:

"The gradual and systematic descent of this book is from Allah power and wisdom are boundless." (39:1,45:2,46:2)

"A book which We have revealed unto thee, that it might lead mankind out of the depths of darkness into light so as to put them on the way planned by their Sustainer who is exalted in power and worthy of all praise." (14:1)

"And We sent down the book to thee for the express purpose that thou should make clear to them those things in which they differ, and that it should be a guide and pattern of nourishment to those who believe." (16:64)

At several other places the Quran has been called, "Kitab un mubeen". A word with the root ("B"-"Y"-"N" ) which means 'to disclose what is hidden', To make things manifest and explicit. It is opposite of the word "katmun" which means 'to hide'. Thus the Quran is a book, a code of life, which discloses hidden realities.

"These are the verses of the book, the Quran that expresses itself clearly and explicity." (15:1, 27:1)

"These are the verses of the book that is explicit.

"We swear by the book that is explicit. (43:2, 44:2)

The Quran has been called "Kitab bil Haqq" which means it is a finally proved and established truth, a reality that cannot be challenged, a constructive code of life.

"That is because Allah sent the book with a finally proved and established truth gradually and orderly, (2:176)

"He has sent down to thee, step by step, the book with the reality that cannot be challenged, (3:3)

We have gradually sent down the constructive book,

"These are the signs from the book which has been sent down to thee from thy sustainer as a finally proved and established truth

The code of life given in the Quran has been called "Mubarak" A word with the root ("B"-"R"-"K") which means, "Preservation, stability, growth, development and manifestation." The word is characteristic of the phenomena relate to the origin of life on the earth. Thus it said:

"Here is the book, a code of life which We have gradually revealed to promote preservation, stability, development and manifestation of human potentialities (6:155)

"Here is the book which We have revealed to thee, providing preservation, stability, development and manifestation to human potentialities,

"This is the book whose verses are explained in detail (so that there remains no ambiguity); a Quran whose language is clear and explicit for men of knowledge." (41:3)

"Shall I seek for judge other than God? When it is He Who has sent unto you the book explained in detail." (6:114)

"We have explained to mankind by displaying different aspects of things in the Quran with every kind of similitude." (18:54)

"Allah has revealed the message from time in the from of a book such a way that it has reached its height in balance and proportion. It is consistent with itself (yet) repeating (its teaching displaying its various aspects)." (39:23)

The Quran is not a book which contains imaginary descriptions. It is rather a code of life.

"We have not instructed (Muhammad) in poetry (false, and imaginary descriptions). Nor does it suit a person (who has come with a revolutionary message). This is no less than a code of life and a Quran that makes things manifest and explicit." (39:69)

The Quran has been called "Kitab in Hakeem" A word with the root ("H"-"K"-"M") which means, "To harness, To place a thing in proper perspective and exact proportion."

Thus it is said:

.

"These are the verses of the book which places things (related to human problems) in their proper position and provide them the exact proportion." (10:1)

"These are the verses of the book which harnesses the human activities in the right direction and provides guidance and pattern to those who lead a life of balance and proportion." (31:2-3)

"This is the book the laws of which are based on permanent values, (11:1)

The Quran is the complete and the final code of life revealed by Allah. It provides guidance for the development of human personality as well as the smooth running of the human society as truly today as it did 1400 years ago and it shall remain as such for all times to come. Anything constructive that we find in the human world today is in consonance with this code; and anything positive, constructive and lasting, which man is in search of, shall be available from this very source. Anything repugnant to this code of life is bound to be negative. Destructive and pershable. Humanity is bound to adopt this code of life, may be willingly or after trails and errors:

"wa innahu la Kitabun Aziz"

"And indeed it is a book whose code of life is bound to dominate." (41:41)

Now let the reader judge for himself. Is it not fantastic to allege that the Quran, after it was revealed, was left uncared for, for a century or so, in a haphazard manner, scattered on pieces of stones, bones and leaves etc. Is it necessary to seek the help of the intriguers, conspirators and the Muslim priests to find out how and by whom the Quran was compiled in the form of a book? In the words of the Quran itself-

(1) It is not a forged book.

(2) It is a confirmation of the revelation which went before it and is a criterion of differentiation between right and wrong.

(3) It places things related to human problems in an orderly manner, in correct perspective and in exact proportion.

(4) It is a book which discloses hidden realities of life.

(5) It is a constructive book.

(6) It is a book whose code of life promotes preservation, stability, growth and manifestation of human personality as well as society.

(7) It is a book which explains itself.

(8) It is not poetry (false, futile, and imaginary description).

(9) It is a book whose laws are based on permanent values.

Can a revealed book of this standard which, according to the Quran itself, was dictated gradually and in bits, simultaneous with its revelation, to the most honourable and pious scribes who were men of great integrity: and then copied, learnt by heart and rehearsed daily by a large number of believers, and whose safety Allah took upon Himself, be said to have been left uncared for?

* (i) "Incidentally a friend of mine, who just had a glimpse of the proof of this chapter while under print, brought to my notice that a Christian Missionary often poses a question, "Where is that parchment paper, on which the Quran was dicated by Muhammed to his scribes?" I explained to him that after the publication of this book of mine, the manuscript on the writing of which I have put in great labour, shall lose its importance. After a few years probably I may not be able to find it out myself. Similarly after the Quran got circulated far and wide, through writing and through the memory of thousands of those who learnt it by heart in the presence of the Rasool, the preservation of the original parchment paper remained no more a matter of great significance. Moreover the companions of the Rasool being men of action, became more absorbed in putting the Quran into action, aftr they grasped it firmly in their memory as well as in a written form; and after the great proclamation the like of which, the world has never heard of:

"We have without doubt sent down the message and We will assuredly guard it." (15:9)

The material world is destructible but not the words of the Quran. After 1400 years, today, there is not a single copy of the Quran which is different from the other even in a small dot; and there is an uproar in the Muslim world if somebody recites or writes down a word of the Quran in a different way. I counter-pose the question, "Is that the case with the Bible or any other revealed book?" Such frivolous objections against the Quran are not new ones. Non-believers raised such objections even during the lifetime of the Rasool. Along with their ridiculous preconditions for the acceptance of the Quranic truth, such as:

"We shall not believe in thee until thou cause a spring to gush forth for us from the earth; or until thou have a garden of date-trees and vines, and cause rivers to gush forth in their midst carrying abundant water; or thou cause the sky to fall into pieces, as thou say shall happen against us; or thou bring God and angels before us face to face; or thou have a house adorned with gold; or thou mount a ladder right into the skies. No, we shall not even believe in thy mounting until thou send down to us (from above) a book that we can read." (17:90-93)

The above-said question raise by the Christian missionary is not an endeavour to find out the reality but is only a manifestation of the perverted mental outlook.

Note: The book, "Conspiracies against the Qur'an" by Dr. Sayed Abdul Wadud" is available from Dost Associates, Al-Kareem Market, Urdu Bazar, Lahore 54000, Pakistan Tel/Fax: (92-42) 7122981, E-mail: shahid.adil@usa.net, tluislam@brain.net.pk

THE CHRISTIAN KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA

2009-07-21T11:18:00.000-07:00

THE CHRISTIAN KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA

Abdelouahed ELKEZIZ

SECRETARY GENERAL

Organisation of the Islamic Conference

October 2003

In the recent turn of events happening on the world stage the ummah has again come under the criticism and the scrutiny of the world in general and the West in particular.

After the tragic attacks of the September 11, 2001 the President of the United States Mr George Bush gave a televised speech where he chose to address the Muslim world directly. There was no accusation made against the Muslims of the world but it was clear that Mr Bush did not address any other faith or religion in his address. Then the call to be "either with us or you are against us" was made which sounded more of a threat and again aimed at the ummah.

After the event of the September 11th, there has been a very resurgent interest in Islam and the Muslim ummah but unfortunately not in a positive manner. There is a great interest now among the West and the world at large to look at Islam with a view to pinpoint at what is wrong with the Muslims.

The recent comment by the American Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence Lieutenant General William G Boykins that the Muslims are worshippers of idols and that Muslims are violent terrorists only highlights the real feelings and attitudes of the Christian West towards the ummah.

I would like to take this opportunity to address the West and the whole world directly and provide some explanation which may help to allay the fears of the West. The gist of my message is that the ummah of today shares a common heritage with the Western world. And when I say the Western world I mean that part of the world which derives its philosophy from the Christian religion and the teachings of the Bible and the Scriptures.

Though it may not be fashionable to associate religion with anything in the West today, nevertheless the idea of Christian values, Christian virtues and Christian civilization is not fully out of vogue yet in the West.

I have chosen to call this message 'A Common Heritage: The Christian Kingdom of Saudi Arabia'. I must insist that I mean no disrespect to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia or to any one else whether Muslim or Christian but merely to show that many of our beliefs and accepted teachings are from a common heritage. There is more that connects the largely Christian West and the Muslim ummah together than sets us apart.

The ?Muslim ummah? is also practicing Christian beliefs but derived largely from the Old Testament of the Christian Bible. The Christians and the West need not worry about "reactionary" Islam or now the more in vogue "terrorist Islam".

The West can and should actually embrace their brethren in the Muslim ummah and welcome us as brothers in faith. The religion practiced as Islam today has evolved much from the time of the Prophet Mohamed and it has changed a lot along the way to reach the shape it is now. In the beginning there was a very simple Islam that was revealed to the Prophet which was sufficiently encapsulated in just one book which is the Quran. But due to the close and very congenial relations between the early Muslims and the old Christians many acceptable beliefs from Christianity have been added to Islam.

Today what is often considered as part of Islam like the covering of the head for women, which has become a point of much discussion in the West, is actually not found in the Muslim holy book the Quran. It is therefore not part of the original teachings of the Prophet Mohamed. Rather it is taken from the Christian Bible and incorporated into the religion because we considered it as an acceptable belief.

Similarly many of the beliefs that are considered Islamic are actually derived from the Jewish scriptures and Christian scriptures. This happened after the time of the Prophet Mohamed. This is simply because after the Prophet Mohamed many Muslim scholars were converts from Christianity, Zoroastrianism and Judaism. Religion was not used to divide but instead the scholars and doctors sought to seek common grounds between them. Hence they were allowed to incorporate their old beliefs from Christianity and Judaism into Islam. To such an extent that the practiced ?Islam? of today is often a verbatim manifestation of the Christian Bible and the Jewish scripture. None of these Biblical teachings were known to the Prophet Mohamed and they cannot be found in the Quran at all but I am happy to tell you that the scholars of Islam are unanimous in accepting these beliefs as part of our religion today.

Therefore our practices like the covering of the head for women should not be contentious at all. Other than the head covering for women, our other practices like ....

- circumcision of males

- punishment of stoning to death for adultery

- punishment of stoning to death for apostasy

- wearing of beards for men

- dietary prohibition of many types of food

- belief of displaying holy writings on the wall

- belief that woman is created from man

- collection of religious tithes or zakat

- injunction against graven images like statutes, sculptures, human and

animal life forms

- religious injunction that menstruating women are spiritually unclean

- ritualized blessing of "Amen" said in the mosques

- concept of "aqedah" as faith

- animal sacrifice "aqeqah" for the birth of children

- celebration of the festival of Eid at the end of Ramadan

.... are all derived from the Christian and Jewish scriptures. This list is only the beginning. It is not exhaustive. These beliefs are not found anywhere in the Quran which is in fact the earliest and only teaching of the Prophet Muhammad. But these teachings can be found in very exact detail in the Christian Bible and the Jewish scriptures.

The Christian West should therefore credit it to the great tolerance and absorption of the early scholars and generations of the Muslim ummah, many of whom were converts from Christianity and Judaism, that they were able to bring with them a vast spectrum of Christian and Jewish beliefs which were accepted and are practiced by Muslims as part of Islam today. Therefore there is no need for the Christian West or the Judeo-Christian world to be apprehensive about Islam.

As the Secretary General of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) I would like to take this opportunity to enlighten the Christian West and the Muslim ummah as well about our common heritage that should bind us together instead of dividing us.

I would like to begin with the issue of the wearing of the head covering for women. In light of the post September 11th events, this issue has been frequently highlighted in the Western media involving Muslim schoolgirls prohibited from wearing the head covering in France and elsewhere.

1. HEAD COVER FOR WOMEN ORIGINATES FROM THE BIBLE

As I mentioned before the wearing of the head covering for women is not part of the Prophet?s teachings and is not found in the Quran. It is a belief and a practice that was taken by the early Muslim scholars from the Christian Bible. Again this clearly shows the great tolerance and acceptance of the Muslim scholars and the Muslim ummah towards the teachings taken from the Christian Bible.

The wearing of the head covering for women is from the Bible, 1st Corinthians, chapter 11 :

Revised Standard Version

[1Cor 11:5] but any woman who prays or prophesies with her head unveiled dishonors her head- it is the same as if her head were shaven.

[1Cor 11:6] For if a woman will not veil herself, then she should cut off her hair; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her wear a veil.

[1Cor 11:10] That is why a woman ought to have a veil on her head, because of the angels.

[1Cor 11:13] Judge for yourselves; is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered?

So the commandment for a woman to cover her head is in the Bible. This belief has seeped into the Muslim belief and has now become part and parcel of the practice of Islam today. The West has no problem with Catholicism putting its nuns in head cover. Surely Mother Theresa would not be considered a terrorist on account of her nun's habit. In Europe today Catholic schools still encourage young girls to take up the wearing of the Catholic head cover.

Unfortunately under the guise of modernity, a vast majority of Christians themselves today are not following the teachings of the Bible - the large majority of Christian women do not cover the head. Hence it is the Muslim ummah who are very good Christians because they still uphold these Bible teachings. As I have said the covering of the head for women is not found in the Quran.

2. CIRCUMCISION IS ALSO DERIVED FROM THE BIBLE

Sunni and Shia ?Muslims? believe that circumcision is a part of their belief and practice circumcision widely. The truth is God and the Prophet never asked the Muslims to circumcise anyone. God says that He made the human in a perfect shape:

[Koran : Chapter 40:64 ] "Allah it is Who appointed for you the earth for a dwelling-place and the sky for a canopy, and fashioned you and perfected your shapes, and hath provided you with good things. Such is Allah, your Lord. Then blessed be Allah, the Lord of the Worlds!"

Indeed God has made us perfect - including the foreskin on the male. There is no need for the human to improve on God's creation - even as an option or an exercise of freewill.

But where does the Muslim belief in circumcision come from ? Once again the answer lies in the Bible. The Covenant of Circumcision in the Bible states.

[Gen 17:14.13] Any uncircumcised male who is not circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin shall be cut off from his people; he has broken my covenant."

[Gen 17:24.16] Abraham was ninety-nine years old when he was circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin.

This is the Covenant of Circumcision. Later Muslims have found this belief acceptable and have incorporated it into their Muslim practises. Again this shows much similarity between Islam and Christianity and proves the tolerance of Islam in absorbing Christian teachings and values from the Bible.

It is the vogue now for the Christian West to raise the alarm about the so called 'Islamic State'. They should not really be afraid. Very often what these Islamic states are doing is implementing nothing more than what is already in the Christian Bible. Very often all the precepts and beliefs for the Islamic state particularly the Shariah Law is based almost entirely on the early Bible tecahings. They are not found in the Quran at all and therefore do not form part of the Prophet's teachings. An Islamic State under Shariah Law is an euphemism for a Biblical Theocracy. This reflects the tolerance of the Muslim faith in accepting and incorporating Biblical teachings into Islam.

Head cover for women, circumcision for converts and other beliefs are all ideas borrowed from the Christian Bible. What has happened is that over time the ideas from the Jewish and Christian theological texts has influenced the Muslim beliefs. In fact this event has also been foretold in the Quran :

[Al-Imran 3:100] O ye who believe! If ye obey a party of the people of the Book, they will make you disbelievers after your belief.

[Al-Imran 3:101] How can ye disbelieve, when it is ye unto whom Allah's revelations are recited, and His messenger is in your midst ? He who holdeth fast to Allah, he indeed is guided unto a right path.

God and the Prophet brought the Quran to the whole ummah. But it is a credit to the great tolerance and understanding of Islam that the Muslim ummah have picked up the Biblical teachings. The fervour to set up and Islamic State is nothing more than establishing the Biblical Theocracy. Let the Lord's Kingdom come.

3. SHARIAH LAWS TAKEN FROM THE BIBLE : PUNISHMENT FOR ADULTERY

The recent cases of stoning women to death for adultery in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Nigeria are laws that are not from the Quran. God and the Prophet never taught the Muslims to stone anyone to death as part of the Shariah Law. The words Shariah Law are not even mentioned in the Quran. The truth is the law for stoning to death as punishment for adultery is taken from the Bible. It cannot be found in the Quran and does not form part of the Prophet's early teachings.

The Bible states explicitly:

[Deut 22:20 - 21] But if the thing is true, that the tokens of virginity were not found in the young woman, then they shall bring out the young woman to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death with stones, because she has wrought folly in Israel by playing the harlot in her father's house; so you shall purge the evil from the midst of you.

This is also the Shariah Law of the Muslims today.

[Deut 22:22] "If a man is found lying with the wife of another man, both of them shall die, the man who lay with the woman, and the woman; so you shall purge the

evil from Israel.

[Deut 22:23 - 24] "If there is a betrothed virgin, and a man meets her in the city and lies with her, then you shall bring them both out to the gate of that city, and you shall stone them to death with stones, the young woman because she did not cry for help though she was in the city, and the man because he violated his neighbor's wife; so you shall purge the evil from the midst of you.

Hence the law of stoning people to death is Biblical which has been accepted by the Muslims who came after the Prophet as evidence of a great tolerance in Islam for absorbing and upholding Biblical teachings. The Christian West should not hold the Muslim ummah in disgust for upholding Biblical laws.

[Lev 20:10] "If a man commits adultery with the wife of his neighbor, both the adulterer and the adulteress shall be put to death.

This is Biblical too. The Shariah Laws of Islam come from the Bible. What does the Quran say ?

[an-Nur 24:2] The adulterer and the adulteress, scourge ye each one of them (with) a hundred stripes. And let not pity for the twain withhold you from obedience to Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a party of believers witness their punishment.

Indeed the Quran prescribes a punishment for adultery. But the punishment meted out is a scourge of 100 lashes. The Quran remains silent on the mode and intensity and leaves it to the good judgement of the future generations of mankind.

4. SHARIAH LAW FROM THE BIBLE - THE PUNISHMENT FOR APOSTASY

The United Nations Charter on Human Rights guarantees the freedom of religion. This right is also guaranteed in the Quran. God and the Prophet guarantee all humans that they have the right to believe or disbelieve as they choose. No man has the right to deny anyone his right to freedom of religion. But the human will be held accountable for whatever he chooses to believe.

The Biblical teachings however say that anyone who blasphemes or becomes an apostate from his faith must be punished with death. The following is clear from the Bible:

Leviticus 24:16

And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, [and] all the congregation shall certainly stone him: as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land, when he blasphemeth the name [of the LORD], shall be put to death.

Included among those who must be put to death are those who bring teachings contrary to the accepted faith or who promote changing the religion. This would include the deviants. The Bible punishes them with death as follows:

Deuteronomy 13:5

And that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death; because he hath spoken to turn [you] away from the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt, and redeemed you out of the house of bondage, to thrust thee out of the way which the LORD thy God commanded thee to walk in. So shalt thou put the evil away from the midst of thee.

Deuteronomy 13:6

If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which [is] as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers;

Deuteronomy 13:7

[Namely], of the gods of the people which [are] round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the [one] end of the earth even unto the [other] end of the earth;

Deuteronomy 13:8

Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him:

Deuteronomy 13:9

But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.

Deuteronomy 13:10

And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.

Again it is the great tolerance and flexible nature of Islam today that these Biblical teachings have been absorbed and are practiced as part of the Islamic Shariah Law. In the Shariah Law of Islam, any Muslim who changes his religion, believes in other religions or even practises a faith different from the mainstream can be put to death. Under the Shariah Law anyone who changes his religion must be put to death. Although this is not part of the Prophet's teachings in the Quran, present day Muslims have absorbed such teachings from the Christian Bible to show their proximity to the Christian faith. Hence there should not be a cause for difference between Islam and the Christian West. We have much in common with each other.

The Prophet no doubt taught us in the Quran that anyone has the freedom to believe or disbelieve as they choose. The Quran is very clear.

[4.137] Surely (as for) those who believe then disbelieve, again believe and again disbelieve, then increase in disbelief, Allah will not forgive them nor guide them in the (right) path.

Belief followed by disbelief followed by belief and then again followed by disbelief and further disbelief is a question of choice. God will decide what best to do with the individual and his choice of belief. There is no earthly punishmnet prescribed in the Quran for those who belief or disbelief.

The list is very long. I will not belabour you and take up too much of your valuable time. Just to give you a concise picture I will list some other beliefs that the Muslims practise today which are not found in the Quran but which are taken from the Christian Bible. Unfortunately because of the ignorance of the general ummah as well as the ordinary Christian people, these beliefs are manipulated by some clever people as excuses to create a rift between the West and Islam.

5. THE TALIBAN'S DESTRUCTION OF STATUES IN BAMIYAN

We all recall the huge hue and cry when the Taliban destroyed priceless ancient treasures in Bamiyan. Under the guise of religion, the Taliban insisted correctly that the statues of the Buddha were idols and had to be destroyed. The Taliban based their actions on Islamic beliefs that have actually been absorbed from the Christian Bible. The Prophet never taught Muslims in the Quran that statues must be destroyed. But it is Biblical teaching that graven images must be destroyed.

Deuteronomy 27

15 "Cursed is the man who carves an image or casts an idol-a thing detestable to the LORD , the work of the craftsman's hands-and sets it up in secret."

Deuteronomy 4

16 so that you do not become corrupt and make for yourselves an idol, an image of any shape, whether formed like a man or a woman, 17 or like any animal on earth or any bird that flies in the air, 18 or like any creature that moves along the ground or any fish in the waters below.

The Muslims have absorbed these Biblical teachings which forbid the making of graven images from stone carvings and other forms. Again this reflects the immense capacity of Islam to tolerate and learn from the Christian Bible. The Quran does not say anywhere that statues or graven images are forbidden or that they must be destroyed. The Christian West has to take account of these truths and give the due credit to Islam for giving fresh life to the Biblical teachings. Islam's proximity to the Bible is much deeper than what the Christian West would like to acknowledge.

6. THE WEARING OF BEARDS FOR MEN

The Christian West has also been disturbed by the Islamic practise where men wear beards. After the event of the September 11th, many Muslim men with beards have been the subject of suspicion and summary searches by police and other law enforcement agencies throughout the West.

These are again not the teachings of the Prophet or the Quran. Instead the wearing of beards for men is taken again from the Christian Bible. Islam has deemed it fit that Muslim men should uphold this religious practise from the Bible. The Christian Bible makes it clear.

Leviticus 19

27 " 'Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard.

Leviticus 21

5 " 'Priests must not shave their heads or shave off the edges of their beards or cut their bodies.

2 Samuel 10

5 When David was told about this, he sent messengers to meet the men, for they were greatly humiliated. The king said, "Stay at Jericho till your beards have grown, and then come back."

Hence the Taliban is not creating anything new when they insisted that men should wear beards. Such teachings are found in the Christian Bible. No doubt the Prophet and the Quran make no mention about the wearing of beards for men but it is the evolution of Islam after the Prophet that attests to Islam's greatness as a religion that has absorbed much from its neighbours, particularly the Christian Bible and the Jewish scriptures.

Muslim scholars over time have themselves debated if the Muslims should continue to uphold these Biblical teachings which are not found in the own Quran. Indeed they are bound by the restrictions in the Quran which are equally clear:

[Quran 2.120] And the Jews will not be pleased with you, nor the Christians until you follow their religion. Say: Surely Allah's guidance, that is the (true) guidance. And if you follow their desires after the knowledge that has come to you, you shall have no guardian from Allah, nor any helper.

The Muslims are told in the Quran that they should not follow the path of the Christians and the Jews. Despite such warning, it is to their great risk and adventurous tolerance that the Muslim scholars have decided to still accept and practise the teachings of the Christian Bible.

The Quran is explicit that the Muslims should not obey the Christians or the Jews:

[3.100] O you who believe! if you obey a party from among those who have been given the Book, they will turn you back as unbelievers after you have believed.

[3.101] But how can you disbelieve while it is you to whom the communications of Allah are

The risk in following the Christian Bible is compounded in the following teaching of the Quran:

[Quran 3.69] A party of the followers of the Book desire that they should lead you astray, and they lead not astray but themselves, and they do not perceive.

[Quran 3.70] O followers of the Book! Why do you disbelieve in the communications of Allah while you witness (them)?

[Quran 3.71] O followers of the Book! Why do you confound the truth with the falsehood and hide the truth while you know?

Despite such warnings, the Muslim scholars, in the interests of preserving harmony and peace with their Christian brothers and sisters have decided that the Biblical teachings are acceptable and should be closely upheld by good Muslims. Therefore the fear by the Christian West is misplaced and unfounded.

In conclusion and as the Secretary General of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference which represents all the Muslim nations in the world, I would like to state that both Muslims and the Christian West should study and take cognisance of the vast area of similarity between the Muslim beliefs and Christian Biblical teachings.

In this age of high tensions, paranoia and fear of everything that is deemed Islamic, the Christian West should appreciate the fact that since a thousand years ago, the Muslim scholars have already shown a great tolerance towards Christianity by learning and absorbing many parts of the Christian Bible into their Islamic faith.

All the things that I have listed above that are taken from the Christian Bible cannot be found in the Muslim's own Quran. Even though the Quran has explicitly forbidden the Muslims from following anything in the Christian Bible the reality of everyday living and practical contacts with the Christians and the Jews have necessitated that Islam be flexible towards Biblical teachings.

This flexibility is evident in Islam until today. In this light I hope that all the Muslims all over the world will make the effort to show their Christian brothers the great amount of our Islamic faith that is drawn from the Christian Bible. At the same time I urge the Christian West too as well as the Jews to give Islam the due credit for basing much of its practical faith in their Christian Bible and Jewish scriptures. We have more that is common between us than actually divides us.

My Journey From the Christianity of Ahlul Sunnah Wal Jamaah to the Islam of the Prophet

2009-07-21T10:39:00.000-07:00

SAIM BAKAR (e-mail: zakaria.salleh@stdform.com.sg)

INTRODUCTION

`My Journey From the Christianity of Ahlul Sunnah Wal Jamaah to the Islam of the Prophet’

This book is dedicated to my Christian brothers Osama bin Laden, the very Christian Imam of the Grand Mosque at Mecca, the Christian Shiah Ayatollahs of Iran, the very Christian Aga Khan and the Ismailis, the Christian Qadiani brothers and the Christian Ahmadiya brothers, the very Christian Tareqah and Christian Sufi brothers, the perfectly Christian Tablighi and the almost one billion other Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah and Shiah people throughout the world who have been duped into being Christians. They think they are Muslim but for over a thousand years they have actually been practising Christianity.

Please read this simple and easy to read book to find out the reasons. I came to realise this not by any design of my own or under anyone else’s guidance but simply through my own research especially from the Quran.

I hope you will all read this book with an objective and intelligent mind (which is not an easy thing to do for the Ahlul Sunnah or the Shiah) and I hope that this book will help you in your journey towards the beautiful and powerful Islam that was revealed to the Prophet of Islam.

The first inkling I got about the influence of Christianity on the Ahlus Sunnah and Shiah are the too many similarities in the beliefs between Christianity and the Ahlus Sunnah and Shiah which are taught to us since we are children. But we have been taught by the priests of Ahlus Sunnah and Shiah that its alright to have so many similarities with the Christians as well as the Jews because all the the Jewish scriptures and the Christian Bible all bore the same teachings. This is not true at all. Only the Quran carries the Truth that withstands scrutiny, criticism and investigation. The Jewish scriptures and the Bible carry too many falsehoods.

But (quite unfortunately and sadly too ) I will prove in this book that what is written in the scriptures of the Christians and Jews that is accepted by the priests of Ahlus Sunnah and Shiah is actually not part of the Prophet’s teachings.

The thing that got me worried from the beginning are the following verses in the Quran.

[Surah 3.100] O you who believe! if you obey a party from among those who have been given the Book, they will turn you back as unbelievers after you have believed.

[Surah 3.101] But how can you disbelieve while it is you to whom the communications of Allah are recited, and among you is His Apostle? And whoever holds fast to Allah, he indeed is guided to the right path

In these verses the Prophet warns us in no uncertain terms that the people of the Book (the Christians and the Jews) will seek to deviate the Muslims away from Islam and back to their religion.

If that is the case how then could the Prophet teach us anything at all that is NOT FOUND in the Quran but is only found inside the Christian Bible and the Jewish scriptures ? We will come to this point again in more detail.

But before I go any further it is important that we speak a little about the Quran. No one – not the Grand Ayatollahs in Iran, not the Chief Imam of the Grand Mosque in Mecca or any other chief priest of Ahlus Sunnah or Shiah knows the contents of the Quran from cover to cover. They recite the Quran like a sing song mantra book but they have no idea about its real contents.

The Quran represents the true spoken word of the Prophet – words that were revealed to him by God. The Quran is very clear about this:

Surah 69:40 ‘Most surely, it is the speech of an honored Apostle’.

The Arabic is unmistakable : “Innahu la kaulu rasuulin kareem”. ‘Kaulu’ means speech. Indeed the Quran represents the speech of the Rasul. When we recite the Quran in the Arabic language we are actually reciting the words that were first spoken out by the Rasul.

Hence I like to paraphrase the verses of the Quran that I quote in this book with these words ‘the Prophet said..’ .

The Quran has been sent down to us also as a confirming scripture or criterion. The Arabic word for a Criterion scripture is ‘furqan’. Here is the verse:

[Surah 25.1] “Blessed is He Who sent down the Furqan upon His servant that he may be a warner to the nations”.

Now it is very simple logic that a confirming scripture can only confirm things that are found within its own pages. For example the Quran says that God created the first female Self and from her God created her spouse. We will discuss this in detail later.

Nowhere does the Quran say that God created the woman from the rib of the man which is what is written in the Christian Bible and also found in the fake hadith. So to be point blank accurate (and also to speak the truth) the Quran cannot confirm the passages in the Christian Bible which say that the woman was created from the rib of the man.

But the priests of Ahlus Sunnah and Shiah believe that indeed the woman was created from the rib of the man. They echo the following Biblical story.

Genesis 2 : 21 – 23 : “But for Adam no suitable helper was found. 21 So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man’s ribs [i] and closed up the place with flesh. 22 Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man. 23 The man said, “This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called ‘woman, for she was taken out of man.”

This story cannot be found inside the Quran therefore the Quran cannot confirm this story. To overcome this deviation from the Quranic truth, the priests of Ahlul Sunnah say that although the Quran does not say so, it is found in the extra Quranic sayings of the Rasul which the Ahlus Sunnah call ‘hadith’ and the Shiah call ‘khabar’.

I would like to pause here for a while. The reader has to stop and ponder this for a minute because it is important. The priests of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah thereby acknowledge that these Christian beliefs are NOT found in the Quran but they are found in their extra Quranic writings of the hadith or the khabar.

To overcome this discrepancy the priests of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah have concocted the further lie that their ridiculous and fake collections of hadith and khabar (both supposedly being recorded sayings of the Rasul) have the same stature as the revealed Quran.

I will also go into much detail about the falsehood of the hadith in the chapters ahead.

The Ahlus Sunnah have their thousands of hadith. Until today they cannot explain which one of their collections of hadith are complete and sufficient. For example if we ask the Ahlus Sunnah ‘Can you lay in front of me the complete collection of all the so called hadith of the Rasul?” they will be dumbfounded. They have none.

CHAPTER 1 WHY WE ARE WHAT WE ARE ?

In asking this question I am referring to the religions that people profess. Why are we Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Ahlul Sunnah (Sunnis), Shiahs, Jews, Zoroastrians and so on ? The answer for the vast majority of us is because we were born into families that were already professing one of these religions. Its as simple as that. Few of us want to question what our parents and grandparents have taught us.

Hindus put ash on their foreheads and pray to stone carvings which they believe represents their gods. They do this because their parents taught them so. A stone carving of a human shape with an elephant’s head for example is representative of a Hindu god. Others like the Sunnis and Shiahs may find such beliefs illogical.

Why does it appear illogical to the Sunnis and Shiahs ? Because they were born into families where parents teach their children to pray toward a stone building in Mecca which they call the Ka’aba. To the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah the representation of god in the form of a stone that looks like a human and elephant hybrid is not acceptable. To the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah praying towards a cubical shaped building also made of stone is more logical than praying towards an elephant human shape also made of stone.

But to the Christian, both the Sunni and Shiah prayer facing a stone building and the Hindu prayer facing a stone carving is also illogical because they have been taught by their parents that a Christian prays towards a cross which may be made of stone or wood or he may even pray towards a stone carving of a human form of Jesus or his mother Mary. To the Christian it is more logical that he pray towards crosses, Jesus and Mary.

Then comes the Jew who says his ultimate holy of holies is a stone wall in Jerusalem. His parents have taught him to nod his head and rock his body to and fro in a wailing motion in front of this wailing wall. Praying facing a stone wall makes better sense to the Jew rather than praying facing a cross, a stone building or a stone carving of a man-elephant hybrid.

The Zoroastrian has done away with all these stone shapes. However the Zoroastrian still has his ‘holy fire’ – the eternal flame that must not go out.

Each person who is born into a sunni, shiah, Zoroastrian, Hindu, Christian or Jewish household will defend his religion to the hilt simply because he was born into the religion. There are some converts into each religion of course who convert out of choice but once converted their children are automatically born into the adopted religion of their fathers.

Why do we believe and uphold our religions so much ? Again the answer is simply because we were born into these religions. We blame it on our parents. We inherit our religions from our parents.

What does the Quran say about inheriting religion from our parents ?

[Surah 2.170] And when it is said to them, Follow what Allah has revealed, they say: Nay! we follow what we found our fathers upon. What ! and though their fathers had no sense at all, nor did they follow the right way.

[Surah 7.28] And when they commit an indecency they say: We found our fathers doing this, and Allah has enjoined it on us. Say: Surely Allah does not enjoin indecency; do you say against Allah what you do not know?

[Surah 7.173] Or you should say: Only our fathers associated others (with Allah) before, and we were an offspring after them: Wilt Thou then destroy us for what the vain doers did?

So we cannot blame our religion on our fathers. God will hold us responsible for our own beliefs – not what our fathers believed because ‘What if our fathers had gone astray ?’ How do we answer to that ? Surely we must exercise our own free will and exercise our own good judgement instead of just blaming it on our fathers.

It is difficult for the human to believe in an Unseen God yet that is what is required of the human :

[Surah 2.3] Those who believe in the unseen and uphold their commitments and spend out of what We have given them.

But the human wants something tangible – a stone carving, a building, a cross, a wall or even fire. Something to make it easy for him to focus on his deity. And he also has his fathers to blame for teaching him his religious logic. But the One God wants us to believe in the Unseen. There can be no manifestation at all of the Unseen God. It is just Trust.

[Surah 2.170] And when it is said to them, Follow what Allah has revealed, they say: Nay! we follow what we found our fathers upon. What! and though their fathers had no sense at all, nor did they follow the right way.

But the human being will not give up his tangible objects of worship. The Sunnis and Shiahs will refuse to read and understand the Quran. They will reject the clear teachings of the Quran which refute all the Sunni and Shiah beliefs that are stolen from the Christian Bible. Out of sheer force of habit and fear of leaving his comfort zone the Sunni and Shiah will choose to prolong the religion of his fathers without wanting to find out what is written in the Quran. The Sunni and Shiah will continue to uphold the Bible.

CHAPTER 2 “AQEEDAH” IS PLAGIARISED FROM THE HEBREW BIBLE

The head covering for women (hijaab) that is practiced by the Sunnis and Shiahs is an idea that is stolen from the Christian Bible. This hijaab idea is NOT Islamic and it is definitely not from the Quran and the Prophet.

We will see proof in this book that the Shariah Laws in the Sharia system of the Sunnis is plagiarized from the Christian Bible. It is NOT from Islam or the Quran which was taught by the Prophet. The Sunni beliefs like the punishment of death for the apostates is also an evil idea stolen from the Christian Bible. For starters I would like to talk about one more Sunni idea that is actually a plagiarism from the Christian Bible. This is the Ahlul Sunnah concept of ‘Aqeedah’.

As we discuss these things I would like to keep reminding the reader that the Ahlul Sunnah and the Shiah are actually practicing Christians. They are giving life to the Christian Biblical teachings which they have been fooled into believing is part of their religion of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah.

In the Sunni religion the concept of “aqeedah” is very important (hebrew : aqeedah, arabic : also aqeedah). The following definition of aqeedah is taken from the ISLAMIC DA`WAH NET at this location :

http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/introduction/aqeedah_alqari.html

“Therefore al-aqeedah according to the scholars of Islam is : the firm creed that one’s heart is fixed upon without any wavering or doubt. It excludes any supposition, doubt or suspicion.”

In fact it is a major concern for the Sunnies that their ‘aqeedah’ or religious creed be on the right track. They are always concerned that ‘aqeedah’ can be deviated or crooked, especially if it is the ‘aqeedah’ of their neighbours. They like to be ‘holier than thou’. They always like to judge their neighbours’ aqeedah.

For example in the never ending struggle between the Shiah and the Ahlul Sunnah cults, the Ahlul Sunnah say that although they may have outward similarities with the Shiahs (for example they both dress up like the Thief of Baghdad) but their aqeedah differs in that the core of their beliefs are different. This gives them an excuse to kill each other.

Other more pliant Sunnies say the exact opposite – they say that although they may have differences between their cults, the Shias and the Sunnis actually share the same aqeedah.

The truth is that this word ‘aqeedah’, which is a source of so much holier than thou persecution inside the Ahlul Sunnah cults, can never be found in the Quran to signify religious faith, religious belief, religious creed etc. In the Quran God and the Prophet never taught us anything about ‘aqeedah’ as referring to “religious faith”. The Quran only refers to faith or ‘iman’ (arabic : eeman). The truth is this word ‘aqeedah’ is not even found in the Quran. There is occurrence of derivatives like ‘uqdah’ referring to ‘the knot of marriage’ (2:235) or ‘aqada’ referring to upholding the proper sharing of inheritances (4:33) but there is no such word as ‘aqeedah’ in the Quran and neither is there any reference of aqeedah as religious creed or binding faith in the Quran.

In their vain attempt to cover up their plagiarizing the concept of aqeedah as ‘binding faith’ from the Bible, some Sunnis try to say that ‘aqeedah’ is found in the Quran. They fail miserably to prove this point. Here is one argument from the Sunnis :

“Al-Aqeedah linguistically is derived from the term aqada. In Arabic, one states, “Aqada the rope” when the rope is tied firmly. And, “Aqada the sale” or “He settled the sale” when the person ratifies and contracts a sale or agreement. And Allah says in the Quran, “And as for those whom your right hands have made a covenant (Ar., aqadat)” [Al-Nisa 33]. And Allah also says, “But He will take you to task for the oaths which you swear in earnest (Ar., aqadtum) [Al-Maida, 89] which means asserted and adhered to, as proven in the verse, “And break not oaths after the assertion of them” [An-Nahl, 91].

In truth none of these verses they refer to above have anything at all to do with the concept of ‘the firm creed that one’s heart is fixed upon without any wavering or doubt’. Each of the verses referred to above carries its own meaning that has nothing to do with the fabricated concept of aqeedah. These are the belatedly lame explanations by the Sunni ulema that have popped up to fill in the yawning gaps in their arguments.

Where does this Sunni idea as well as the word ‘aqeedah’ come from ? Would anyone like to guess ? It comes from the Christian Bible, in this case the Hebrew language Bible. It is NOT found in the Quran. Aqeedah is also a Hebrew word.

The Oxford Companion to the Bible talks about ‘aqeedah’ on page 43.

“Aqedah: The Hebrew word for ‘binding’, and the common designation for Genesis 22:1 – 19 in which God tests Abraham by commanding that he sacrifice his son Isaac. Abraham “binds” Isaac (verse 9).”

“The New Testament refers to the aqedah not as an example of a redemptive sacrificial death but rather as an example of “FAITH”. See the following verses:

[Jas 2:21] Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he offered his son Isaac upon the altar?

[Heb 11:17] By FAITH Abraham, when he was tested, offered up Isaac, and he who had received the promises was ready to offer up his only son,

[Rom 4:16] That is why it depends on FAITH, in order that the promise may rest on grace and be guaranteed to all his descendants– not only to the adherents of the law but also to those who share the faith of Abraham, for he is the father of us all,”

The Oxford Companion to the Bible also says that “From antiquity the AQEDAH has been portrayed in the arts. For example it appears on a wall painting of the third century CE SYNAGOGUE at Dura-Europos and on a floor mosaic of the sixth century SYNAGOGUE at Beth Alpha.”

Long before any Sunni thought of ‘aqeedah’ as ‘the firm creed that one’s heart is fixed upon’ the Jews and Christians had already drawn paintings and illustrations about aqeedah or ‘binding faith’ in the Third Century and the Sixth Century.

The Prophet is believed to have existed around the Seventh century (so they say). The cult or madhab of Ahlul Sunnah did not come into existence until about the Tenth century. The Sunni ideas about aqeedah were not written down until later. So the Christians had a seven hundred year head start talking about ‘aqeedah’.

Again the Bible is the real source of the ‘aqeedah’ or religious creed of the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah. They have plagiarized their religious creed from the Christian Bible. There is not one thing they do which is from the Quran. The Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah are actually good Christians.

CHAPTER 3 THE AHLUS SUNNAH’S DEATH SENTENCE FOR APOSTATES IS STOLEN FROM THE CHRISTIAN BIBLE : NOT FROM THE QURAN

The Sharia Law of the Ahlus Sunnah has codified the Hudood Offences which includes the offence of apostasy or irtidaa which according to them is punishable by death. Under the Hudood Punishments of the Shariah Laws an apostate or murtad must be killed.

There is no punishment for apostasy in the Quran. According to God and the Prophet in the Quran a person can jump into and out of belief. Here is the verse from the Quran that proves it :

Surah 4:137 ‘Surely those who believe then disbelieve, again believe and again disbelieve, then increase in disbelief, Allah will not forgive them nor guide them in the (right) path’.

If we believe in God we are guided. If we do not believe in God, God will deal with us in the Hereafter. This is what the Prophet has taught us. In the Quran there is no prescribed temporal punishment for the apostate, other than his fate rests with God.

But where does the Ahlul Sunnah belief that the apostate must be killed come from ? It comes from the Christian Bible. This very dangerous and evil belief that the apostate must be killed has created too much bloodshed and division among the ummah over the past centuries.

‘You are out of the fold therefore your blood is halal’ has been the battle cry of too many lost souls which has destroyed too many nations in the past.

In many Ahlul Sunnah countries like Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Malaysia – if you are NOT a follower of the accepted mainstream Ahlul Sunnah sect you can be jailed and fined. In Saudi Arabia the Shiahs are discriminated against. In Pakistan from time to time the Shiahs are just shot and killed by the Ahlul Sunnah. Of course the Shiahs also return the affection from time to time.

The false belief among the Ahlul Sunnah that they must punish apostates has no basis in the Quran. It is another false Ahlul Sunnah belief stolen from the Christian Bible and then passed off as the teaching of the Prophet, sunnah of the Prophet etc. Here is the source of this false teaching from the Bible :

Leviticus 24:16

‘Moreover, the one who blasphemes the name of the LORD shall surely be put to death; all the congregation shall certainly stone him. The alien as well as the native, when he blasphemes the Name, shall be put to death.

Here according to the book of Leviticus in the Bible anyone who blasphemes the name of the Lord shall be put to death. He shall be stoned to death. Here is more of this ‘let’s kill the apostates’ insanity from the Christian Bible :

Deuteronomy13:5

“But that prophet or that dreamer of dreams shall be put to death, because he has counseled rebellion against the LORD your God who brought you from the land of Egypt and redeemed you from the house of slavery, to seduce you from the way in which the LORD your God commanded you to walk. So you shall purge the evil from among you.

According to the Bible anyone who thinks differently (dreamer of dreams) shall be killed. This is the real teaching of the Christian Bible. Just kill people who do not wish to believe like you anymore. Here is yet more killing from the Bible :

Deuteronomy 13:6 – 10

“If your brother, your mother’s son, or your son or daughter, or the wife you cherish, or your friend who is as your own soul, entice you secretly, saying, ‘Let us go and serve other gods’ you shall not yield to him or listen to him; and your eye shall not pity him, nor shall you spare or conceal him. “But you shall surely kill him; your hand shall be first against him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people. “So you shall stone him to death because he has sought to seduce you from the LORD your God who brought you out from the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery.

So this is what the Bible says. Those who blaspheme the name of the Lord, those who are ‘dreamers of dreams’, those who tell you to serve other gods must all be put to death. And the ulema or the priests shall have the final say in deciding what exactly is blasphemy, who exactly is a dreamer of dreams, what exactly is ‘enticing you’ etc. If the ulema say you are outside their ‘aqeedah’ then you can be killed.

Anyway this is NOT the teaching of Islam, God or the Prophet. God never revealed anything like this to the Prophet. Instead God and the Prophet are very clear about what to do with those who switch from belief to unbelief then back to belief and then to unbelief again.

[Surah 4.137] Surely those who believe then disbelieve, again believe and again disbelieve, then increase in disbelief, Allah will not forgive them nor guide them in the (right) path.

One needs to be constantly alive to jump in and out of belief like this. The Quran allows this freedom of belief and disbelief but such a person who persists in disbelief will of course never be forgiven by God. There is no temporal punishment prescribed anywhere in the Quran for rejecting belief. This evil and barbaric punishment of death for apostates is stolen from the Christian Bible.

The Bible and the Shariah Laws of the Ahlul Sunnah do not allow any freedom of belief. According to the Bible and the Sharia Law of the Ahlul Sunnah a person should be put to death when he jumps from belief to disbelief. It is clear again that the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah reject the teachings of God and the Prophet in the Quran. Instead they prefer to plagiarise Biblical teachings and pass it off as the teachings of the Prophet.

CHAPTER 4 PAGAN PUNISHMENT FOR ADULTERY ALSO STOLEN FROM THE CHRISTIAN BIBLE.

In this chapter I wish to show more evidence of the so called Hudood Laws (part of the Sharia Laws of the religion of Ahlus Sunnah) that are plagiarized from the Christian Bible. In this case we shall look at the laws relating to the punishment for adultery.

The Sharia Laws state that the adulteress and the adulterer shall be stoned to death. If they are not married the punishment is 100 lashes. This is a great blasphemy against the Prophet and is an attempt to smear the good name of Islam. Stoning to death is NOT part of Islam.

This is another false law the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah have stolen from the Christian Bible. Here is the evidence :

Deuteronomy 22: 23 – 24

22 If a man is found sleeping with another man’s wife, both the man who slept with her and the woman must die. You must purge the evil from Israel.

23 If a man happens to meet in a town a virgin pledged to be married and he sleeps with her, 24 you shall take both of them to the gate of that town and stone them to death-the girl because she was in a town and did not scream for help, and the man because he violated another man’s wife. You must purge the evil from among you.

This is the source of the evil Sharia Law where the Ahlul Sunnah say that the adulterer and the adulteress must be stoned to death.

The Bible repeats this death penalty again :

Leviticus 20:10

10 ” ‘If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife-with the wife of his neighbor-both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death.

Coming now to the Ahlul Sunnah, in the collection of fake hadith known as the Sahih al Bukhari (Volume 8, pages 209-210, translation by Dr Muhammad Muhsin Khan) we read this alleged sermon delivered by someone by the name of Hadhrath Umar during his last Hajj as Khalifa:

“Certainly Allah sent Muhammad with the truth, and revealed to him

the Book. One of the revelations which came to him was the verse of

stoning. We read it and understood it. The Messenger of God stoned and we stoned after him. I am concerned that if time goes on, someone may say, ‘By God, we do not find the verse of stoning in the Book of God;’ thus, the Muslims will deviate by neglecting a commandment the Almighty revealed.”

“Stoning is in the Book of God. It is the right punishment for a

person who commits adultery if the required witnesses are available,

or there was pregnancy without marriage or adultery is admitted.”

“When the verses “Rajm” [Stoning] and ayah “Rezah Kabir” descended,

they were written on a piece of paper and kept under my pillow. Following the demise of Prophet Muhammad (S) a goat ate the piece of paper while we were mourning.

Refer also 1. Sunan Ibne Majah, Volume 2, Page 39, Published Karachi, 2. Musnad Imam Ahmad, Volume 6, Page 269, Published Beirut and 3. Taweel Mukhtalif Al Hadees, Page 310, Published Beirut.

This is the famous false hadith where the ulema say that the verse of stoning people to death was revealed by God and then became abrogated after a GOAT ate the piece of paper or parchment on which this verse was written. This story is too ridiculous even to justify any comment. If indeed the GOAT ate the verse and caused it to be abrogated, then why still keep in practice a verse that has been abrogated by a hungry GOAT ?

This killing the adulteress / adulterer or stoning them to death is NOT found anywhere in the Quran at all. About those who commit zina (adultery) the Quran says the following :

[24.2] (As for) the fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them, (giving) a hundred stripes, and let not pity for them detain you in the matter of obedience to Allah, if you believe in Allah and the last day, and let a party of believers witness their chastisement.

This is the Quranic law. But according to the Christian Bible and the false hadeeth created by the ulema, the adulterer and the adulteress must both be stoned to death or killed. Since the Bible came before the hadeeth, we now know that the false hadeeth about stoning people to death is stolen from the Christian Bible.

Just like the head covering for women, the law of stoning the adulterer/ adulteress to death is also plagiarized from the Bible. Indeed the Ahlus Sunnah are actually Christians. They are not Muslims.

They have created a great fitnah against the Prophet by saying that the Prophet prescribed the stoning of people to death for adultery.

The act of people stoning other people is indeed recorded five times in the Quran. In all these occurrences the people who performed the act of stoning were pagan disbelievers. Nowhere in the Quran does it mention that any believer or Muslim shall stone another human being.

Of course the exception to this is God Himself who says that He has rained stones upon evil communities of the past. But God also says that He can burn the wrongdoers in the hellfire, wipe out the wrongdoers by earthquakes, send diseases against them and so on. That is all within God’s power but nowhere in the Quran does God ask any human to stone another human for anything. In the Quran, the act of stoning other people is always the practice of the pagans. Here are all the five occurrences of pagans stoning people in the Quran :

In Surah 26:116 Noah was threatened with stoning by the pagan disbelievers.

In Surah 19:46 Abraham’s father who was a pagan disbeliever threatens to stone Abraham.

In Surah 18:20 the Companions of the Cave (Ashaabul Kahfi) are in fear of being stoned by the pagan disbelievers.

In Surah 36:18 three messengers are threatened with stoning by the pagan disbelievers.

In Surah 11:91 the Prophet Shuaib is threatened with stoning by the pagan disbelievers.

Throughout the Quran the only people who resort to stoning are the pagan disbelievers. Stoning people is not a punishment sanctioned by Islam.

We have already quoted the verse above (Surah 24:2) which prescribes the punishment of 100 lashes for the adulteress and the adulterer. Here are some other verses that talk about punishing adulterous behaviour.

[4.22] And marry not woman whom your fathers married, except what has already passed; this surely is indecent and hateful, and it is an evil way.

[4.23] Forbidden to you are your mothers and your daughters and your sisters and your paternal aunts and your maternal aunts and brothers’ daughters and sisters’ daughters and your mothers that have suckled you and your foster-sisters and mothers of your wives and your step-daughters who are in your guardianship, (born) of your wives to whom you have gone in, but if you have not gone in to them, there is no blame on you (in marrying them), and the wives of your sons who are of your own loins and that you should have two sisters together, except what has already passed; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

[4.24] And all married women except those whom your right hands possess (this is) Allah’s ordinance to you, and lawful for you are (all women) besides those, provided that you seek (them) with your property, taking (them) in marriage not committing fornication. Then as to those whom you profit by, give them their dowries as appointed; and there is no blame on you about what you mutually agree after what is appointed; surely Allah is Knowing, Wise.

[4.25] And whoever among you has not within his power ampleness of means to marry free believing women, then (he may marry) of those whom your right hands possess from among your believing maidens; and Allah knows best your faith: you are (sprung) the one from the other; so marry them with the permission of their masters, and give them their dowries justly, they being chaste, not fornicating, nor receiving paramours; and when they are taken in marriage, then if they are guilty of indecency, they shall suffer half the punishment which is (inflicted) upon free women. This is for him among you who fears falling into evil; and that you abstain is better for you, and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

[4.26] Allah desires to explain to you, and to guide you into the ways of those before you, and to turn to you (mercifully), and Allah is Knowing, Wise.

In 4:25 above we are advised to marry believing women or even bondwomen. If the bondwomen who are married later commit sexual indecency then their punishment shall be half the punishment meted out to the free believing women.

This can only be possible if the punishment for adultery for example is 100 lashes as per Surah 24:2. The punishment for the bondwomen who commit adultery would then be 50 lashes or half the punishment for free women. If the punishment for adultery was stoning to death, then how do the ulema stone someone ‘half to death’ ?

It is clear that the ulema stand on stupid ground when they try to uphold false teachings from the Christian Bible against the true teachings of the Prophet in the Quran. The ulema have caused a lot of chaos, confusion and hardship for the ummah because they insist on upholding falsehoods from the Christian Bible.

CHAPTER 5 WHY THE PROPHET COULD NEVER HAVE FOLLOWED THE BIBLE

So far we have seen in detail the various practices of the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah which are not found anywhere in the Quran. Instead I have shown the actual references in the Christian Bible from where these Sunni and Shiah beliefs are plagiarized.

Their false belief that the woman must cover the head, the evil Shariah Laws (stoning to death for adultery, death for apostates), the circumcision of males, their long list of permissible halal and forbidden haram foods and other beliefs CANNOT be found in the Quran AT ALL. They are just not part of Allah’s teachings. They are found in the Christian Bible. From the Bible many of these falsehoods were plagiarized and then passed off as ‘prophet’s hadith’, ‘prophet’s sunnah’, teachings of the sahaba etc. Essentially this is what has become the religion of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah. They are Christians. They are NOT part of Islam.

Some ulema say that these Biblical teachings were indeed known to the Prophet and he had then repeated these Biblical beliefs as part of his hadith and sunnah. The ulema call these the ‘israiliyah’ teachings. That is why there is much similarity between the Bible and the hadeeth – so they say !! What a fantastic confession ! This is another lie by the ulema which is also patently false and is a terrible slander against the Prophet and Islam.

Firstly Allah told the prophet:

[Surah 3 : 3 - 4 ] He has revealed to you the Book with truth, verifying that which is before it, and He revealed the Taurat and the Injeel aforetime, a guidance for the people, and He sent the Furqan. Surely they who disbelieve in the revelations of Allah they shall have a severe chastisement; and Allah is Mighty, the Lord of retribution.

The Quran has been revealed to the Rasul as a Criterion or Furqan to verify what was before it, including the Taurat and Injeel. So the Quran can be used to verify things. Now the Quran can only verify things that are found inside the Quran. If the Quran has A, B, C and D whereas the Bible has E, F and G then the Quran cannot verify E,F and G. Its as simple as that.

And true enough the Quran says:

[Surah 2.78] And there are among them illiterates who know not the Book but only lies, and they do but conjecture.

[Surah 2.79] Woe, then, to those who write the book with their hands and then say: This is from God, so that they may take for it a small price; therefore woe to them for what their hands have written and woe to them for what they earn.

Indeed the Christians have written today’s Bible with their own hands and then they say ‘This is from God’. The Christian Bible of today is actually a compilation of various works by various writers. For example the Gospel of Imam Mark, the Gospel of Imam Mathew, the Gospel of Imam Luke and so on. This is exactly like the Gospel of Imam Bukhari, the Gospel of Imam Muslim and the Gospel of Imam Tirmizi, the Gospel of Imam Jaafar Al Tusi, the Gospel of Imam Al Radi etc among the Sunnis and Shiahs. They all write their books with their own hands and then say ‘This is from God’. But again as a Criterion or Furqan the Quran cannot confirm what they have written. Too bad for them.

And still, because they have no proof or logical arguments the Sunnis and Shiahs will say ‘The Prophet repeated to us some of the Biblical teachings because it is part of the earlier revelation given to Moses and Jesus’.

Firstly could the Prophet have known what was in the Christian Bible ? Or even in the Injeel ? What does the Quran say ?

[Surah 42.52] And thus did We reveal to you an inspired book by Our command. You did not know what the Book was, nor faith but We made it a light, guiding thereby whom We please of Our servants; and most surely you show the way to the right path.

The Prophet definitely did not know what was the Book. He definitely did not know the Christian Bible or the Injeel or Taurat. He did not even know what was faith – ‘You did not know what the Book was, nor faith..’

Now for argument’s sake only, assuming that the Prophet did know about the Christian Bible, especially those parts that are NOT found in the Quran (for example circumcision, stoning people to death, death for apostates, head cover for women etc) could he have taken these teachings from the Christian Bible and put it into ‘his hadith’ and then say ‘This is also from God’ ? The answer is again a straight NO because Allah had already warned the Prophet :

[Surah 3:69] A party of the followers of the Book desire that they should lead you astray, and they lead not astray but themselves, and they do not perceive.

[Surah 3:70] O followers of the Book! Why do you disbelieve in the revelations of Allah while you witness ?

[Surah 3:71] O followers of the Book! Why do you confound the truth with the falsehood and hide the truth while you know?

This is what the people of the Book were trying to do. They were confounding truth with falsehood. They were writing the book with their own hands and then said ‘This is from God’. Allah is warning the Prophet that a party of the people of the Book were trying to lead him astray.

Throughout the Quran Allah warns the Prophet to be on the lookout for the people of the Book. They will constantly try to divert the Muslims from the Truth.

[Surah 3:186] You shall certainly be tried respecting your wealth and your souls, and you shall certainly hear from those who have been given the Book before you and from those who are polytheists much annoying talk; and if you are patient and guard (against evil), surely this is one of the affairs (which should be) determined upon.

The Prophet and the believers must be constantly on guard against the polytheists and the people of the Book. They will constantly bombard the believers with all kinds of talk. The people of the Book also sold the Truth away for a cheap price. What they were given before from Allah was discarded behind their backs. Here is what Allah says:

[Surah 3:187] And when Allah made a covenant with those who were given the Book: You shall certainly make it known to men and you shall not hide it; but they cast it behind their backs and took a small price for it; so evil is that which they buy.

After throwing away God’s teachings they wrote their own books like the Christian Bible and the Jewish scriptures. Allah again and again warns the Prophet to be careful about the Christians and the Jews. Allah tells the Prophet:

[2.120] And the Jews will not be pleased with you, nor the Christians until you follow their religion. Say: Surely Allah’s guidance, that is the (true) guidance. And if you follow their desires after the knowledge that has come to you, you shall have no guardian from Allah, nor any helper.

Again Allah warns the Prophet – the Jews and the Christians will not be pleased until you follow their religion. Allah warns the Prophet ‘do not follow the Christians and the Jews’. Only the Quran is the true guidance. The Christians and Jews were not able to penetrate the Prophet but they have certainly misled the millions of ulema who came after the Prophet.

But let us stop and think for a minute. After all this warning by Allah not to follow the Christians and Jews, that the Christians have written things with their own hands, that the Christians will not stop until they corrupt you etc, will the Prophet still go out and collect ‘sayings’ from the Christian Bible THAT ARE NOT IN THE QURAN and then pass it off to the ummah as his own ‘hadith’ or ‘sunnah’ or whatever ? Please think carefully. This is not possible.

The Prophet cannot say, “I know the head cover for women is NOT in the Quran but it is in the Christian Bible and it is alright for you to follow it”.

The Prophet cannot say, “I know the Quran only talks about 100 lashes punishment for the adulterer and adulteress and I know that there is NO death penalty for adultery in the Quran but the Christian Bible prescribes stoning to death for the adulterer and I think we should follow the stoning to death also”. The Prophet simply cannot do something like this.

Instead the Prophet told us all to be careful of the People of the Book. The Prophet told us :

[3.100] O you who believe! if you obey a party from among those who have been given the Book, they will turn you back as unbelievers after you have believed.

So if we believe a party from among the Christians and Jews, then we will become kuffar or disbelievers. This is what has happened to the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah. They have become kuffar or disbelievers because they have chosen to obey the Christian Bible and the Jewish scriptures.

The Quran does NOT teach us stoning to death for adulterers, killing apostates, circumcision of males etc. But the Christian Bible teaches us such things. So if you believe these teachings from the Christian Bible then you become a disbeliever – a kuffar.

The Jews and the Christians were not be pleased. They wanted the Prophet to follow their Bible. But the Prophet never followed their Bible. He was commanded to say :

[3.98] Say: O followers of the Book! why do you disbelieve in the ayaah of Allah? And Allah is a witness of what you do.

The Prophet is telling the Jews and Christians, why do you reject the Quran ? Why do you still follow your Bible ? the Prophet asks them some more:

[3.99] Say: O followers of the Book! why do you hinder him who believes from the way of Allah? You seek (to make) it crooked, while you are witness, and Allah is not heedless of what you do.

The Prophet told the Jews and Christians: Why are you trying so hard to change the Muslims into Christians and Jews ? Why do you want to deviate those who believe in Allah and the Quran ?

THEN THE PROPHET TURNS TO THE BELIEVERS, THAT IS THE MUSLIMS AND WARNS THEM :

[3.100] O you who believe! if you obey a party from among those who have been given the Book, they will turn you back as unbelievers after you have believed.

But unfortunately this is what the so called ulema have done. After the Prophet died, they created all sorts of fake stories and started following the Bible. Many of the things they teach us today are actually Bible teachings stolen from the Christian Bible. Anyway the Prophet continues:

[3.101] But how can you disbelieve while it is you to whom the communications of Allah are recited, and among you is His Apostle? And whoever holds fast to Allah, he indeed is guided to the right path.

So dear readers how can you believe in all these Bible teachings when you have Allah’s Quran with you ? Why dont you read and obey the Quran instead of obeying and following the Bible. Please be careful of your duty to Allah.

[3.102] O you who believe! be careful of (your duty to) Allah with the care which is due to Him, and do not die unless you are Muslims.

So dear brothers and sisters. Do Not die as Ahlul Sunnah Christians. Live and die as Muslims.

CHAPTER 6 The Ulema Teach Prostitution, Paedophilia, Fornication and Sexual Depravity.

In this chapter I would like to list some really sick teachings of the ulema which again promote evil and promiscuity. It is a false delusion that the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah are promoting high moral values and chaste behaviour. They actually glorify illicit sexual behaviour.

Dallying with prostitutes

The Shiah Ayatollahs say that men can even marry women temporarily for an agreed period of time like one day or for a few hours at a time. They call this mutaa. In truth this is nothing more than prostitution.

This is not surprising at all because according to the hadith writers the Prophet even allowed mingling with prostitutes. Here is the false hadith:

Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 139:

Narrated Abdullah:

We used to participate in the holy wars carried on by the Prophet and we had no women (wives) with us. So we said (to the Prophet ). “Shall we castrate ourselves?” But the Prophet forbade us to do that and thenceforth he allowed us to marry a woman (temporarily) by giving her even a garment, and then he recited: “O you who believe! Do not make unlawful the good things which Allah has made lawful for you.”

This false hadith says that during ‘holy wars’ the Prophet allowed his men to ‘marry a woman temporarily by giving her even a garment’ ! This is a terrible slander and lie against the Prophet and his men. This false hadith attempts to portray them as having other things on their mind other than the struggle alongside the Prophet. This evil hadith accuses the Prophet of setting the price of dallying with a woman at just one piece of garment.

The Prophet’s true teachings in the Quran tells the men to control their lusts and keep chaste. Here is the verse:

[Surah 24:33] And let those who do not find the means to marry keep chaste until Allah makes them free from want out of His grace. And (as for) those who ask for a writing from among those whom your right hands possess, give them the writing if you know any good in them, and give them of the wealth of Allah which He has given you; and do not compel your slave girls to prostitution, when they desire to keep chaste, in order to seek the frail good of this world’s life; and whoever compels them, then surely after their compulsion Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

The Prophet taught us from God that we should keep chaste until we get married. We also cannot compel the slave girls into prostitution. How then could the Prophet allow his men to seek the company of prostitutes ‘even for the price of a garment’ ?. This is an obvious slander and evil lie against the Prophet by the ulema like Bukhari. If the ulema refuse to acknowledge this verse from the Quran, here is another verse from the Quran which says the same thing:

Surah 24:30 ‘Say to the believing men that they cast down their looks and guard their private parts; that is purer for them; surely Allah is Aware of what they do.’

This is what the Prophet taught us in the Quran. Muslims are to lower their gaze and control their lusts. But as usual the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah will reject this Quranic teaching. They like to preach that the Prophet told his men to go after prostitutes for the price of a piece of garment. They prefer to follow their own books of false hadith which they have written with their own hands.

In his famous biography of the Prophet the Ahlul Sunnah writer Martin Lings quotes evil and false hadith which say that on his wedding day the Prophet’s father was almost enticed by a Christian woman because she could see a certain light that he had in him. The Christian woman by the name of Qutaylah tried to seduce the Prophet’s father as he was on his way to be married. Then according to the evil hadith writers, after the Prophet was conceived his father did meet the woman again but he noticed that Qutaylah was not interested in him anymore. She told him that the light that he carried in him was gone. (See Muhammad: His Life Based On The Earliest Sources by Martin Lings (Abu Bakar Siraj al-Din), page 17 – 18)

This is the evil falsehood they write in the so called sahih hadith or authentic hadith. The Prophet has taught us from God that no one except God has knowledge of the unseen yet the ulema would have us believe their fake hadith that a Christian woman could see the ‘light’ that was being carried by the Prophet’s father.

The Arabs have never stopped their association with prostitutes to glorify their leaders. The founder of Saudi Arabia King Abdul Aziz ibn Saud is revered by his numerous sons and daughters. They tell stories about how before his campaign to capture Riyadh, the future capital of Saudi Arabia, Abdul Aziz was in the company of a prostitute one night. However the prostitute asked him, ‘Who are you?’ for all to hear. “Abdul Aziz ibn Saud ? You should be ashamed of yourself. Stop hanging around here wasting your strength and spirit. Come back when you’ve achieved something you can truly boast about. We’ll know what measure of man you are when you have conquered Riyadh!” (From the book ‘Kingdom’ by Robert Lacey)

So the founder and ruler of the Ahlul Sunnah kingdom of Saudi Arabia was saved by a prostitute. She refused to entertain him on account of him being their great leader. Nevertheless she did ask him to come back after he had captured Riyadh !

Evil Pornography about the Prophet Solomon.

Here is some pornography about the Prophet Solomon from the evil Bukhari.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 55, Number 635:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Prophet said, “Solomon (the son of) David said, ‘Tonight I will sleep with seventy ladies each of whom will conceive a child who will be a knight fighting for “Allah’s Cause.’ His companion said, ‘If Allah will.’ But Solomon did not say so; therefore none of those women got pregnant except one who gave birth to a half child.” The Prophet further said, “If the Prophet Solomon had said it (i.e. ‘If Allah will’) he would have begotten children who would have fought in Allah’s Cause.” Shuaib and Ibn Abi Az-Zinad said, “Ninety (women) is more correct (than seventy).”

This false hadith is nothing more than a stag show off. Here the Prophet Solomon is alleged to have slept with seventy women in one night (other satanic ulema say 90 women). Assuming a night was about twelve hours long this meant that Solomon copulated non stop with slightly more than seven women every hour or with one woman about every eight minutes. Why would the Prophet Solomon want to do that ? Is that the job of a Prophet ? And what lessons does this type of copulation hold for mankind ?

What the ulema have done is make lawful prostitution and promiscuity. They have writen the fake hadeeth and the sick theology which they like to call ‘jurisprudence’ or Fiqh (pronounced fake). In this fake fiqh they promote totally depraved licentious behaviour. Here is some more of their ‘evidence’.

More Ulema Sexual Depravity – This Time From Imam Malik

The infamous book “Al Muwatta” by Imam Malik is considered by the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah as the “First Formulation of Law” (may God forbid). Imam Malik is considered one of the great fuqaha or doctors of jurisprudence among the Sunnis. The following false hadith is taken from the Al Muwatta of Imam Malik.

Translation of Malik’s Muwatta

http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muwatta/

Translators: `A’isha `Abdarahman at-Tarjumana and Ya`qub Johnson

Section: Suckling of Older People

Book 30, Number 30.2.12:

Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab that he was asked about the suckling of an older person. He said, ”Urwa ibn az-Zubayr informed me that Abu Hudhayfa ibn Utba ibn Rabia, one of the companions of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, who was present at Badr, adopted Salim (who is called Salim, the mawla of Abu Hudhayfa) as the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, adopted Zayd ibn Haritha. He thought of him as his son, and Abu Hudhayfa married him to his brother’s sister, Fatima bint al-Walid ibn Utba ibn Rabia, who was at that time among the first emigrants. She was one of the best unmarried women of the Quraysh. When Allah the Exalted sent down in His Book what He sent down about Zayd ibn Haritha, ‘Call them after their true fathers. That is more equitable in the sight of Allah. If you do not know who their fathers were then they are your brothers in the deen and your mawali,’ (Sura 33 ayat 5) people in this position were traced back to their fathers. When the father was not known, they were traced to their mawla.

“Sahla bint Suhayl who was the wife of Abu Hudhayfa, and one of the tribe of Amr ibn Luayy, came to the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, and said, ‘Messenger of Allah! We think of Salim as a son and he comes in to see me while I am uncovered. We only have one room, so what do you think about the situation?’ The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, ‘Give him five drinks of your milk and he will be mahram by it.’ She then saw him as a foster son. A’isha umm al-muminin took that as a precedent for whatever men she wanted to be able to come to see her. She ordered her sister, Umm Kulthum bint Abi Bakr as-Siddiq and the daughters of her brother to give milk to whichever men she wanted to be able to come in to see her. The rest of the wives of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, refused to let anyone come in to them by such nursing. They said, ‘No! By Allah! We think that what the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, ordered Sahla bint Suhayl to do was only an indulgence concerning the nursing of Salim alone. No! By Allah! No one will come in upon us by such nursing!’

“This is what the wives of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, thought about the suckling of an older person.”

According to Imam Malik, the Prophet told Sahla to allow a grown man called Salim to suckle from her breasts. And we are required to believe that as a grown man Salim did suckle from Sahla.

Then we are required to believe that Aisha (the prophet’s alleged wife) told her sister Umm Kalthum and the daughters of her brother to give milk to any grown man who wanted to come and see her.

My question to the Ahlul Sunnah is this ‘How do you implement this most satanic teaching? This is what the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah teach us to believe.

The ulema like this satanic Imam Malik actually promote licentiousness and sexual depravity. A very sick hadith like this does not need any explanation at all.

“THEY SHALL BECOME MONKEYS..”

The Quran says the following about some people who have really earned God’s anger. I believe this verse refers to the people of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah. The Quran says :

[Surah 5.60] Say: Shall I inform you of (him who is) worse than this in retribution from Allah? (Worse is he) whom Allah has cursed and brought His wrath upon, and of whom He made monkeys and pigs, and he who served the Shaitan; these are worse in place and more erring from the straight path.

God threatens to make the people who serve the Shaitan into monkeys and pigs. Is this an illogical threat ? I don’t think so. This is not a magical curse that will change people into monkeys and pigs (like the Prince Charming of the Fairy Tale who was turned into a frog by the wicked witch). There is no evidence in recorded history that anyone was turned into a pig or monkey. But when God promises to do something we can rest assured that He will do it. Hence it could only mean that by their behaviour the people who serve the Shaitaan will become monkeys and pigs. They may force themselves to appear like monkeys. They may be greedy gluttons like pigs.

We cannot deny that there are people in the world today who are followers of the Shaitan and I believe God has indeed made them into monkeys and pigs.

I believe these people are the Arab ulema and also the followers of Ahlul Sunnah and the Shiah.

By their appearance the Arab ulema and also the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah prefer to be unshaven and grow their beards long. It does give them the appearance of the hairy apes or monkeys.

But it does not stop there. By their own admission the Ahlul Sunnah also claim to follow the monkeys. The Ahlul Sunnah ulema believe that the punishment for adultery is stoning people to death. This false teaching is not found in the Quran. It is stolen from the Christian Bible. (Please see the chapter on Punishment for Adultery). But the Ahlul Sunnah will not admit that they have stolen these ideas from the Christian Bible. Instead they say they got the idea to stone people from the monkeys. By their own confession the Ahlul Sunnah fall into the punishment God has promised them – they confess that they are indeed followers of monkeys. Here is the evidence from their own Bukhari hadith.

Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 188:

Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

During the pre-lslamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a number of monkeys. They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal

sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them.

This is the basis of the Ahlul Sunnah’s false belief of stoning people to death for adultery. They learnt it from the monkeys. Hence the words of my God are proven true :

(Surah 5.60] Say: Shall I inform you of (him who is) worse than this in retribution from Allah? (Worse is he) whom Allah has cursed and brought His wrath upon, and of whom He made monkeys and pigs, and he who served the Shaitan; these are worse in place and more erring from the straight path.

God has indeed made the Ahlul Sunnah into monkeys. Their Sharia Law of stoning adulterers to death is copied from the monkeys.

Polygamy : The Arabs Learned It From The Monkeys Too !

Then the ulema make lawful polygamy ie they say that men can marry four wives. This is actually making lawful the old pagan Arab culture of maintaining harems full of slave women for their pleasure. By falsely saying that Islam allows polygamy, they are legalizing the prostitution of the harems.

Here too the Ahlul Sunnah particularly the Arabs may have learnt this polygamous harem behaviour from the monkeys. The Arabian Peninsula, Yemen, Ethiopia and Somalia are home to the Hamadryas Baboon. These baboons have lived in arid sub-desert and savannah woodlands of these countries for a long time. Just like the Arabs the Hamadryas baboons live in a very harsh environment with extreme temperatures, both hot and cold. What is interesting is that Hamadryas baboons are very social and have a four-level social structure. The male baboons maintain harems where a group of up to 10 females can be dominated by an adult male. These baboons that live in and around Arabia are the only known baboons that maintain harems.

Two or more such harems of Hamadryas baboons make up a clan, with single male followers. A band of Hamadryas Baboons is made up of several such clans.

And when several clans of Baboons band together it is called a troupe.

This is not unlike the polygamous harems maintained by the Arabs. There is no basis in the Quran for polygamy. It is most likely that the Arabs who claim to learn from monkeys how to stone adulterers to death have also learned polygamy from the Hamadryas Baboons. Indeed God has made them into monkeys.

The ulema’s confusion about polygamyu starts with the following verse in the Quran which they interpret as follows :

Surah 4:3] And if you fear that you cannot act equitably towards orphans, then marry such women as seem good to you, two and three and four; but if you fear that you will not do justice (between them), then (marry) only one or what your right hands possess; this is more proper, that you may not deviate from the right course.

Based on this verse they feel they can marry two, three or four wives.

This verse is actually a continuation of the previous verse ie Surah 4:2. Just like 4:2, this verse 4:3 is clearly talking about taking care of the interests of the orphans. And the verse tells us to ultimately marry off those orphans who seem good in our judgement in twos, three or fours. In other words just marry them off. The Arabic is clear :

fankihuu : thus marry them off

maathaaba : those who seem good

lakum : to you

minannisaa : from the women

matsnaa, wathulaatha warubaa : twos, threes and fours.

The other point to note here are the words twos, threes and fours. The Arabic is “matsnaa, wathulaatha warubaa” . Elsewhere in the Quran these exact words are used to describe the ‘wings’ of the malaikah (or what is commonly understood to be angels). Here is the verse:

[Surah 35.1] All praise is due to Allah, the Originator of the heavens and the earth, the Maker of the malaikah messengers flying on wings, two, and three, and four; He increases in creation what He pleases; surely Allah has power over all things.

The malaikah messengers seem to have wings “matsnaa, wathulaatha warubaa” or twos, threes and fours.

It signifies a plurality and not exactly two wings, exactly three wings or exactly four wings. Although we have no way of imagining a malaikah flying on three wings but the realms of human knowledge (the parameters in which God communicates with us human beings) makes it for an unbalanced flight with three wings.

But the Quran tells us that we can never be equally fair among the women :

[Surah 4: 129] And you have it not in your power to be fair between wives, even though you may wish (it), but be not disinclined with total disinclination, so that you leave her as it were in suspense; and if you effect a reconciliation and guard (against evil), then surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

The God Who created us is telling us that we cannot be fair among the women.

It is therefore better to have just one wife. Having spoken so much that we cannot be fair among women it would not be possible for the same God to tell us to marry two, three or four wives. It is also the natural inclination of all women that they detest polygamy when their husbands marry other women. This has been the case in all cultures and in all corners of the world. That is why to sustain their polygamous tendencies and harem behaviour the Arabs have developed a culture that totally puts the women down and treats women like chattels. This is the only way the Arabs can force their women to live in harems. And the Arab ulema have played along and legitimized this harem behaviour of the Arabs.

Ulema Make The Prophet A Paedophile

Then the ulema have also written false hadith which makes the prophet a paedophile. They say that the Prophet married a girl by the name of Aishah at the age of six years. Here is the slanderous and evil false hadith by Bukhari :

Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 236:

Narrated Hisham’s father: Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married ‘Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.

Ashamed of this false hadith but not having the guts to admit their false beliefs, some of the Ahlul Sunnah have classified this embarrassing subject “one of the most controversial issues confronting Muslims today”.

Indeed the forces of kuffar who have created these false stories and slander against the good name of the Prophet by saying that the Prophet married a six year old child and then consummated the marriage when she was nine years old are squirming in their pants to avoid explaining this falsehood.

Firstly these forces of kuffar cannot pinpoint exactly the age of the alleged Aisha when she is alleged to have married the Prophet. Other false versions of the same hadith say Aisha was 9 when she married the Prophet and the marriage was consummated when she was 14 or 16. They themselves do not know which version is the ‘most authentic’ ?

Also the satanic ulema are too embarrassed to admit that despite their lie that the Prophet married a 6 year old girl they temselves will not give away their daughters in marriage at 6 years of age.

This is the hypocrisy of these satans. They will argue that it was alright for the Prophet to marry 6 year old children but it does NOT apply to their daughters or sisters. This is the greatest and the absolute proof against these falsehoods.

The Age of Marriage in Islam

It is really very simple to find out what Islam says about the age of marriage. We just check verses from the Quran that talk about nikah (marriage) as well as verses that talk about young women. Here are some of these verses. All of them specifically mention marrying women who have reached puberty:

[Surah 4.25] And whoever among you has not within his power ampleness of means to marry free believing women, then (he may marry) of those whom your right hands possess from among your believing maidens; and Allah knows best your faith: you are (sprung) the one from the other; so marry them with the permission of their masters, and give them their dowries justly, they being chaste, not fornicating, nor receiving paramours; and when they are taken in marriage, then if they are guilty of indecency, they shall suffer half the punishment which is (inflicted) upon free women. This is for him among you who fears falling into evil; and that you abstain is better for you, and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

Please pay attention to the words “of those whom your right hands possess from among your believing maidens”. ‘Believeing maidens’. The word for maiden is ‘fatayaati’. Fatayaati is not a six year old child. Fatayaati means a ‘young woman’. Fatayaati is female. The male youth or young man is ‘fataah’. A good example is the story of Nabi Yusuf when he was seduced (as a young man) by the ruler’s wife. Here is the verse:

[Surah 12.30] And women in the city said: The ruler’s wife seeks her young man (fataaha) to yield himself (to her), surely he has affected her deeply with love; most surely we see her in manifest error.

Fataah is a young man – (capable of loving a woman as in the story of Yusuf in 12:30). Likewise ‘fataayati’ is a young woman (suitable for marriage as recommended in 4:25 above). Nowhere in the Quran does it say that you can marry a 5 year old toddler or 6 year old toddler.

That is just another satanic false hadith invented by the enemies of Islam to make the Prophet a paedophile.

Here is another verse about marrying young girls who are orphans.

[Surah 4.127] And they ask you a decision about women. Say: Allah makes known to you His decision concerning them, and that which is recited to you in the Book concerning female orphans whom you do not give what is appointed for them while you desire to marry them, and concerning the weak among children, and that you should deal towards orphans with equity; and whatever good you do, Allah surely knows it.

And what is recited in the Book concerning marrying female orphans ? Here is the answer :

[Surah 4.6] And test the orphans until they attain the age of marriage (puberty); then if you find in them maturity of intellect, make over to them their property, and do not consume it extravagantly and hastily, lest they attain to full age; and whoever is rich, let him abstain altogether, and whoever is poor, let him eat reasonably; then when you make over to them their property, call witnesses in their presence; and Allah is enough as a Reckoner.

‘Hatta izaa balaghu nikaaha’ which means ‘until they reach marriageable age’. Let not the satanic ulema of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah start pretending to be idiots and say reaching marriageable age or ‘balaghu nikaaha’ can also mean 6 year old or 5 year old toddlers.

And here is yet another verse that talks about marrying believing young women :

[Surah 2.221] And do not marry the idolatresses until they believe, and certainly a believing maid is better than an idolatress woman, even though she should please you; and do not give (believing women) in marriage to idolaters until they believe, and certainly a believing servant is better than an idolater, even though he should please you; these invite to the fire, and Allah invites to the garden and to forgiveness by His will, and makes clear His communications to men, that they may be mindful.

There is nothing here about marrying 6 yr old pre pubescent toddlers. You are supposed to marry ‘believing maiden women’ (amaatun mu’minaatun). Nowhere does the Quran tell us to marry 5 yr old or 6 yr old toddlers.

There are more verses but these should suffice. In all these verses above which talk about marriage (nikaah) the words used include

‘fatayaati’ (young women),

balaghu nikaah (reach marriageable age),

amaatun mu’minaatun (believeing maidens)

Nowhere in the Quran is the Rasul commanded to teach the believers to marry 6 year old toddlers.

Surely if the Rasul tells the people to marry young women (fataayati), or to marry believing maidens (amaatun mu’minaatun) or talks about orphans reaching the age of marriage (balaghu nikaah) then the Prophet cannot possibly turn around and tell the ummah ‘Well guys while you are all marrying young women, maidens and such I am going to marry a 6 yr old toddler’.

This is an evil lie and a slander against the good name of the Prophet of islam.

This evil lie and slander has been concocted against the Rasul by the forces of kuffar or the disbelievers. Today the agents of these forces of kuffar are the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah who are blindly and stupidly regurgitating these falsehoods.

Their problem is that with the age of the Internet and almost instant communications their stupidity runs the risk of suffering instant debunking and embarrassment. In the old days the fools can hide inside their madrasahs, their books and their madhabs. Today they cannot. They run into people who can severely embarrass them – simply by telling the truth from the Quran.

These foolish ulema do not know the Quran at all. They waste their lives pursuing falsehoods.

[Surah 3.69 - 71 ] A party of the followers of the Book desire that they should lead you astray, and they lead not astray but themselves, and they do not perceive. O followers of the Book! Why do you disbelieve in the revelations of Allah while you witness ? O followers of the Book! Why do you confound the truth with the falsehood and hide the truth while you know?

The followers of the Book will not believe the Quran. They seek to lead the Muslims astray. They will do this by making the Muslims follow their Bible.

[Surah 2.120] And the Jews will not be pleased with you, nor the Christians until you follow their religion. Say: Surely Allah’s guidance, that is the (true) guidance. And if you follow their desires after the knowledge that has come to you, you shall have no guardian from Allah, nor any helper.

We cannot follow the Bible or the Jewish scriptures. We must only follow the Quran which is God’s true guidance.

[3.100] O you who believe! if you obey a party from among those who have been given the Book, they will turn you back as unbelievers after you have believed.

If we follow the Christian and the Jewish books. Then we will become kaffir or disbelievers. This is what has happened to the Ahlul Sunnah and the Shiah.

CHAPTER 7 : THE FALSEHOOD ABOUT ABRAHAM AND THE FALSE SACRIFICE OF HIS SON.

The Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah have invented many falsehoods about Abraham – whom God appointed the imam or leader for all mankind (imamu lin nass). The evil falsehoods which the Ahlus Sunnah and Shiah have fabricated about this important Rasul or Messenger of God seek to corrupt the image of Abraham, his wife, his son and family.

Again these falsehoods are all plagiarized from the Christian Bible. These falsehoods also completely contradict the Quran. We will show proofs from the Quran and expose these lies against the good Prophet and Messenger Abraham and his family.

Firstly here is one concocted story from the Christian Bible. This Biblical slander against the Prophet Abraham forms the basis for the false hadith that has been written down by the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah. This is taken from the Book of Genesis :

Genesis 16 : 1 – 16

Hagar and Ishmael

1 Now Sarai, Abram’s wife, had borne him no children. But she had an Egyptian maidservant named Hagar; 2 so she said to Abram, “The LORD has kept me from having children. Go, sleep with my maidservant; perhaps I can build a family through her.”

Abram agreed to what Sarai said. 3 So after Abram had been living in Canaan ten years, Sarai his wife took her Egyptian maidservant Hagar and gave her to her husband to be his wife. 4 He slept with Hagar, and she conceived.

When she knew she was pregnant, she began to despise her mistress. 5 Then Sarai said to Abram, “You are responsible for the wrong I am suffering. I put my servant in your arms, and now that she knows she is pregnant, she despises me. May the LORD judge between you and me.”

6 “Your servant is in your hands,” Abram said. “Do with her whatever you think best.” Then Sarai mistreated Hagar; so she fled from her.

7 The angel of the LORD found Hagar near a spring in the desert; it was the spring that is beside the road to Shur. 8 And he said, “Hagar, servant of Sarai, where have you come from, and where are you going?”

“I’m running away from my mistress Sarai,” she answered.

9 Then the angel of the LORD told her, “Go back to your mistress and submit to her.” 10 The angel added, “I will so increase your descendants that they will be too numerous to count.”

11 The angel of the LORD also said to her:

“You are now with child

and you will have a son.

You shall name him Ishmael, [a]

for the LORD has heard of your misery.

12 He will be a wild donkey of a man;

his hand will be against everyone

and everyone’s hand against him,

and he will live in hostility

toward [b] all his brothers.”

13 She gave this name to the LORD who spoke to her: “You are the God who sees me,” for she said, “I have now seen [c] the One who sees me.” 14 That is why the well was called Beer Lahai Roi [d] ; it is still there, between Kadesh and Bered.

15 So Hagar bore Abram a son, and Abram gave the name Ishmael to the son she had borne. 16 Abram was eighty-six years old when Hagar bore him Ishmael.

Now here is the fake hadith from the Bukhari collection which forms the basis of the Ahlul Sunnah’s lies about Abraham. Note the extreme similarity between the Christian Bible and the fake Bukhari hadith.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 55, Number 584:

Narrated Ibn Abbas:

When Abraham had differences with his wife), (because of her jealousy of Hajar, Ishmael’s mother), he took Ishmael and his mother and went away. They had a water-skin with them containing some water, Ishmael’s mother used to drink water from the water-skin so that her milk would increase for her child. When Abraham reached Mecca, he made her sit under a tree and afterwards returned home. Ishmael’s mother followed him, and when they reached Kada’, she called him from behind, ‘O Abraham! To whom are you leaving us?’ He replied, ‘(I am leaving you) to Allah’s (Care).’ She said, ‘I am satisfied to be with Allah.’ She returned to her place and started drinking water from the water-skin, and her milk increased for her child. When the water had all been used up, she said to herself, ‘I’d better go and look so that I may see somebody.’ She ascended the Safa mountain and looked, hoping to see somebody, but in vain. When she came down to the valley, she ran till she reached the Marwa mountain. She ran to and fro (between the two mountains) many times. They she said to herself, ‘i’d better go and see the state of the child,’ she went and found it in a state of one on the point of dying. She could not endure to watch it dying and said (to herself), ‘If I go and look, I may find somebody.’ She went and ascended the Safa mountain and looked for a long while but could not find anybody. Thus she completed seven rounds (of running) between Safa and Marwa. Again she said (to herself), ‘I’d better go back and see the state of the child.’ But suddenly she heard a voice, and she said to that strange voice, ‘Help us if you can offer any help.’ Lo! It was Gabriel (who had made the voice). Gabriel hit the earth with his heel like this (Ibn ‘Abbas hit the earth with his heel to Illustrate it), and so the water gushed out. Ishmael’s mother was astonished and started digging.

This is the false Biblical story that has been reproduced in the hadith of Bukhari about the jealousy of Abraham’s wife Sarah towards a supposed bondwoman by the name of Hagar whom she ‘gave’ to her husband Abraham to bed. According to this false hadith, at that time Sarah herself could not bear children and decided to give her bondwoman as a mistress to her husband.

Firstly the names Sarah and Hajar are not mentioned anywhere in the Quran therefore the Quran cannot confirm these names that are mentioned in the Bible as well as in the false hadith books.

The idea that a Prophet and Rasul of God would even have a slavegirl in his household is repulsive of all the teachings of the Quran and what God taught to Abraham and Moses. The Prophets of God came to free slaves – NOT to have slave girls in their household. This is what the Prophet taught us :

Surah [90 : 4 - 16]

[90.4] Certainly We have created man in distress.

[90.5] Does he think that no one has power over him?

[90.6] He shall say: I have wasted much wealth.

[90.7] Does he think that no one sees him?

[90.8] Have We not given him two eyes,

[90.9] And a tongue and two lips,

[90.10] And pointed out to him the two conspicuous ways?

[90.11] But he would not attempt the uphill road,

[90.12] And what will make you comprehend what the uphill road is?

[90.13] (It is) the setting free of a slave,

[90.14] Or the giving of food in a day of hunger

[90.15] To an orphan, having relationship,

[90.16] Or to the poor man lying in the dust.

God will show man two paths (two conspicuous ways ?). He must choose the path that requires greater commitment and effort. That is the path of freeing the slaves, feeding the hungry, feeding the orphans and the poor man. Never will God ask anyone, especially His chosen Prophets and Rasuls to keep slave girls in their homes and then take their slave girls as mistresses.

Also God’s teaching for mankind is that men should always marry the women before bedding them but here the false hadith says the Prophet Abraham slept with a slave girl.

But the falsehood against Abraham and his family continues. Long before the Quran, the Christians had already fabricated another slander against the Almighty God that He had commanded the Prophet Abraham to sacrifice his son. The evil slander by the Christians makes both God and Abraham parties to a barbaric ritual sacrifice of a human life. Even the very thought of this evil slander is preposterous. Here is the Biblical slander against God and Abraham :

Genesis 22

Abraham Tested

1 Some time later God tested Abraham. He said to him, “Abraham!”

“Here I am,” he replied.

2 Then God said, “Take your son, your only son, Isaac, whom you love, and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains I will tell you about.”

3 Early the next morning Abraham got up and saddled his donkey. He took with him two of his servants and his son Isaac. When he had cut enough wood for the burnt offering, he set out for the place God had told him about. 4 On the third day Abraham looked up and saw the place in the distance. 5 He said to his servants, “Stay here with the donkey while I and the boy go over there. We will worship and then we will come back to you.”

6 Abraham took the wood for the burnt offering and placed it on his son Isaac, and he himself carried the fire and the knife. As the two of them went on together, 7 Isaac spoke up and said to his father Abraham, “Father?”

“Yes, my son?” Abraham replied.

“The fire and wood are here,” Isaac said, “but where is the lamb for the burnt offering?”

8 Abraham answered, “God himself will provide the lamb for the burnt offering, my son.” And the two of them went on together.

9 When they reached the place God had told him about, Abraham built an altar there and arranged the wood on it. He bound his son Isaac and laid him on the altar, on top of the wood. 10 Then he reached out his hand and took the knife to slay his son. 11 But the angel of the LORD called out to him from heaven, “Abraham! Abraham!”

“Here I am,” he replied.

12 “Do not lay a hand on the boy,” he said. “Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son.”

13 Abraham looked up and there in a thicket he saw a ram [a] caught by its horns. He went over and took the ram and sacrificed it as a burnt offering instead of his son. 14 So Abraham called that place The LORD Will Provide. And to this day it is said, “On the mountain of the LORD it will be provided.”

15 The angel of the LORD called to Abraham from heaven a second time 16 and said, “I swear by myself, declares the LORD , that because you have done this and have not withheld your son, your only son, 17 I will surely bless you and make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and as the sand on the seashore. Your descendants will take possession of the cities of their enemies, 18 and through your offspring [b] all nations on earth will be blessed, because you have obeyed me.”

This is the Biblical story of Abraham wanting to sacrifice his son because allegedly Abraham thought it was God’s command. The Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah have swallowed this false Biblical story hook, line and sinker. Until today, to commemorate this slander against God and the Prophet Abraham the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah sacrifice goats, camels and cows on the Feast of Sacrifice or Eid Al Adha which also forms one of the cornerstones of their pilgrimage ritual in Mecca.

The story of Abraham trying to sacrifice his son is recorded in the Quran but in completely different detail. The Quran cannot confirm the Biblical story at all. Here is the beautiful Quranic version :

Sura 37

37: 102. When he (Ismail) grew enough to work with him, he (Abraham) said, “My son, I see in my sleep (araa’ fil manami) that I am sacrificing you. What do you think?” He said, “O my father, do what you are commanded to do. You will find me, God willing, patient.”

37: 103. They both submitted, and he put his forehead down.

37: 104. We called him: “O Abraham.

37: 105. “surely you have confirmed the dream (qad saddakta al ru’ya) ?” We thus reward the righteous.

[The word ‘saddaqta’ means ‘to confirm’. For example refer Surah 66:12 where Mary confirms (saddaqa) the words of her Lord as true].

37: 106. That was an exacting test indeed.

37: 107. We redeemed him with a great sacrifice.

37: 108. And we preserved his history for subsequent generations.

37: 109. Peace be upon Abraham.

37: 110. We thus reward the righteous.

37: 111. He is one of our believing servants.

This is the accurate record in the Quran of Abraham trying to fulfil what he saw in his sleep. But this was definitely NOT a commandment from God. It was just what Abraham saw in his sleep. Let us analyse what the Quran says.

Firstly in the narrative above we see the following:

Surah 37: 102. When he (Ismail) grew enough to work with him, he (Abraham) said, “My son, I see in my sleep (araa’ fil manaami) that I am sacrificing you. What do you think?” He said, “O my father, do what you are commanded to do. You will find me, God willing, patient.”

When God commands his Messengers to do something He gives them clear commandments which leave no room for misunderstanding by the Messengers. See the following verses :

Surah 10:15 “when our signs are recited to them, clear signs”

Surah 7:101 “their messengers came to them with clear signs”

Surah 2:87 “We gave Jesus son of Mary clear signs”

Surah 2:92 “Moses came to you with clear signs”

Hence it is not likely that God would give Abraham unclear commands such that after seeing something in his sleep (manami), we find Abraham asking his son ‘What do you think?’ This cannot be the behaviour of a Messenger of God when carrying out God’s commands.

Then we see that a command to kill one’s own child totally contradicts God’s teachings as follows :

[Surah 6.151] “Say: Come I will recite what your Lord has forbidden to you — that you do not associate anything with Him and show kindness to your parents, and do not slay your children for (fear of) poverty– We provide for you and for them — and do not draw nigh to indecencies, those of them which are apparent and those which are concealed, and do not kill the soul which Allah has forbidden except for the requirements of justice; this He has enjoined you with, that you may understand.”

The Prophet taught us God’s command that we cannot kill our children even for fear of poverty. So how can God command another Prophet to kill his own son as a ‘sacrifice’ ? And the verse further says that we cannot kill any soul except in justice. Where was the justice in Abraham killing his son ? What crime or sin had Abraham’s son committed ?

In the following verse God tells us that the killing of children (human sacrifice) is indeed a pagan practice.

[Surah 6.137] “And thus their pagan idols have made fair to the pagan polytheists the killing of their children, that they may cause them to perish and obscure for them their religion; and if Allah had pleased, they would not have done it, therefore leave them and that which they forge.”

God’s command to mankind is that the killing of children (human sacrifice) is a pagan practice. Therefore it is impossible for God to command Abraham to carry out the pagan practice of killing his own son. Here is another verse from the Quran that forbids the killing of children:

The ulema of course reject all the above verses of the Quran. They would rather believe the Biblical slander that God commanded the Prophet Abraham to sacrifice his son. The ulema prefer the barbaric act of killing your own son.

They say that God never intended that Abraham’s son would be killed. It was merely a test. Here is another verse that exposes the ulema’s slander against God and the Prophet Abraham :

[Surah 60.12] O Prophet! when believing women come to you giving you a pledge that they will not associate aught with Allah, and will not steal, and will not commit fornication, and will not kill their children, and will not bring a calumny which they have forged of themselves, and will not disobey you in what is good, accept their pledge, and ask forgiveness for them from Allah; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

In this verse the test specifically prescribed by God to accept the pledge of believing women includes their promise that they will not kill their children. This is because it is a great sin to kill one’s own child. Therefore it is impossible that God would test Abraham in the the exact opposite manner ie by giving Abraham a command to kill his own child.

Would Abraham have known about these commandments by God that we should not kill our children ? He certainly would have known because God tells us that whatever He revealed in the Quran has been revealed before to Abraham and Moses :

Surah 87 : 18 – 19

“Most surely this is in the earlier scriptures, the scriptures of Ibrahim and Musa.”

Most certainly then God had also taught Abraham previously that human sacrifice was a sinful thing to do. But not the Christian Bible. The Christian Bible teaches the falsehood that God commanded Abraham to sacrifice his son. Christians also believe that they must perform a cannibalistic type ritual of drinking the blood of Christ who they again believe was ‘sacrificed’ by God to atone for human sins. This belief in human sacrifice alone exposes the pagan origins of Christianity. Unfortunately the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah have plagiarized this false Christian belief.

And we are told clearly in the Quran that killing an innocent believing soul is a great sin:

“Anyone who kills a believer on purpose, his retribution is Hell, wherein he abides forever, God is angry with him, and condemns him, and has prepared for him a terrible retribution.” 4:93

The retribution for killing another believer is hellfire. Here is another verse:

“No believer shall kill another believer, unless by mistake…. ” 4:92

Again a believer cannot kill another believer. That would be against God’s teachings.

We are then told in the Quran that God NEVER advocates sin:

” … Say, “God never advocates sin. Are you saying about God what you do not know?” Surah 7:28.

After teaching mankind that killing their own children is a pagan act and a sin and that the retribution for the sin of killing a believer is the Hellfire – God cannot contradict Himself by giving Abraham a test which requires Abraham to kill his own son.

If we put these facts side by side, we know that Abraham’s son was a good believer, thus killing him would be a sin, and we know that God NEVER advocates sin. The truth becomes clear; Abraham had a dream but it was not from God.

But because Abraham was a righteous believer “We thus reward the righteous” God intervened and saved Abraham’s son. God intervened and saved Abraham from commiting a great sin (37:107).

The ulema of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah will however reject all these verses from the Quran. That is because they are disbelievers or kuffar. They will prefer to uphold the Christian Biblical story that God commanded Abraham to sacrifice his son.

CHAPTER 8 HALAL AND HARAM FOOD : THE SUNNIS AND SHI’AHS OBSERVE CHRISTIAN / JEWISH SCRIPTURE

Just like many other practises which we have described so far, the Sunni and the Shiah too follow many prohibitions on food that is taken almost exactly, word for word from the Christian Bible.

Before we see where they have gone totally wrong, firstly let us see what exactly the Quran makes lawful (HALAL) and unlawful (HARAM) in terms of food.

[Surah 5:3] “Forbidden unto you (for food) are carrion and running blood and swineflesh, and that which hath been dedicated unto any other than Allah..”

The Quran only forbids FOUR TYPES of food ie carrion, running blood, pork and things (any food item) that has been dedicated to something other than God (eg on an altar, slaughtered by a human being with a particular identity etc).

The verse also continues with more detail about animals that are dead:

“( also forbidden are) and the strangled, and the dead through beating, and the dead through falling from a height, and that which hath been killed by horns, and the devoured of wild beasts, saving that which ye make lawful, and that which hath been immolated unto idols” (5:3).

Other than this, EVERYTHING ELSE is halal for Muslims. Yes, that would include frogs, crocodiles, alligators, birds and whatever else – AS LONG AS they are good for you. The Arabs say that they can eat desert lizards or dhawab. The founder of Saudi Arabia Abdul Aziz ibn Saud used to feast on desert lizards (dhawab) and desert rats.

[Surah 5:4] “They ask thee (O Muhammad) what is made lawful for them. Say: “ALL GOOD THINGS are made lawful for you. And that which the dogs catch which ye have trained as dogs are trained, ye teach them that which Allah taught you; so eat of that which they catch for you and mention Allah’s name upon it, and observe your duty to Allah. Lo! Allah is swift to take account”.

People asked the Prophet “What is made lawful for them ?’ The Prophet was commanded to say “ALL GOOD THINGS ARE MADE LAWFUL FOR YOU”. And this includes what your DOGS catch for you (see verse 5:4 above).

This also means that Muslims can keep and rear DOGS and even use the DOGS to catch food. Such food is halal. But many of the sunnis today say it is haram to keep dogs. They hate dogs.

For thousands of years and until today millions of people have been eating porcupine, marsh rats, snakes, crocodiles etc. These animals are much sought after in various countries and people eat them because the animals make up good food. Similarly even the fake hadith records the Arabs eating desert lizards called ‘dawwab’. Arabs and Pakistanis also eat locusts and other insects too. The Scandinavians eat an animal called the musk rat. The Amazonian Indians eat a large rodent called the capybara.

For these peoples desert lizards, musk rats and capybara are good food. So let them eat it – according to the Quran it is halal.

Similarly the aboriginal peoples have been eating squirrels, monkeys and other such creatures since God created them on the surface of the earth. The human being can eat all these because they are good for them.

These are all HALAL because “ALL GOOD THINGS ARE MADE LAWFUL FOR YOU” (5:4).

If you follow the Quran, you can eat anything that is good for your body except pork, running blood, dead animals and desecrated food. VERY simple. If you ollow the Quran, you can survive anywhere on God’s earth. (I have seen Sunni “tourists” starving themselves in Papua New Guinea. They kept eating bread for three days)

This is because the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah have come up with very long lists of foods which they have prohibited. Not surprisingly (because they are all falsehoods) you find differences between the sunnis, shiahs, shafiee, hanafi, maliki, hanbali sub cults etc on what exactly is halal or haram.

For example some say crabs are haram, frogs are haram, birds with talons are haram, animals with canine teeth are haram and other such things. If you refer the book ‘Al Halal Wal Haram Fil Islam’ by Yusuf Qardawi you will understand what I mean. They are not supposed to forbid or make haram all these foods, but the sunni and shiah ulema do not care. They are smarter than God.

[Surah 5:87] O ye who believe! Forbid not the good things which Allah hath made lawful for you, and transgress not, Lo! Allah loveth not transgressors.

[Surah 5:88] Eat of that which Allah hath bestowed on you as food lawful and good, and keep your duty to Allah in Whom ye are believers

But the sunni and shiah do not care. They can make unlawful what God has made lawful. They are greater than God. And where do they get their strange ideas ? You guessed it. The Bible of course.

Another example is that God has made lawful to hunt in the sea and to eat anything from the sea. Everything from the sea is halal for eating.

[Surah 5:96] To hunt and to eat of the sea is made lawful for you, a provision for you and for seafarers..”

Therefore for thousands of years Eskimos hunt and eat seals and walruses and whales and all kinds of fish. (What else could they possibly eat ?) And we all eat fish from the sea. Also turtles, sharks, sea cucumbers, crayfish etc. All this is lawful according to God and the Prophet in the Quran. But the sunni and shiah have created their own confusing lists of what is lawful and what is not lawful – even from the sea.

For example the Shafiee (or is it the Hanafi) sub cults among the Sunnis say that fish without scales are haram. This would make sharks and certain fishes without scales haram. Some also say that eels are haram because they are serpents. Some say mud crabs are ‘makruh’ or ‘not encouraged’ to be eaten because they live in two habitats i.e. in water and on land.

Where do these strange ideas come from ? You guessed it folks. It comes from the Christian Bible. The Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah faith is plagiarized from the Bible.

And here it is :

[Lev 11:9] “These you may eat, of all that are in the waters. Everything in the waters that has fins and scales, whether in the seas or in the rivers, you may eat.

But just like some of the Ahlul Sunnah sects the Bible says you cannot eat the following:

[Lev 11:10] But anything in the seas or the rivers that has not fins and scales, of the swarming (crawling) creatures in the waters and of the living creatures that are in the waters, is an abomination to you.

[Lev 11:11] They shall remain an abomination to you; of their flesh you shall not eat, and their carcasses you shall have in abomination.

[Lev 11:12] Everything in the waters that has not fins and scales is an abomination to you.

This is exactly what some of the Sunnis say ie fish without scales are haram, crabs are haram or “makruh” etc..

Similarly the Ahlul Sunnah have made a list of birds that CANNOT be eaten. Included in this list are the birds of prey and other kinds of birds. They summarise it by saying you cannot eat birds with talons or curved beaks. Again this is only too similar to the following list found in the Bible:

[Lev 11:13] “And these you shall have in abomination among the birds, they shall not be eaten, they are an abomination: the eagle, the vulture, the osprey,

[Lev 11:14] the kite, the falcon according to its kind,

[Lev 11:15] every raven according to its kind,

[Lev 11:16] the ostrich, the nighthawk, the sea gull, the hawk according to its kind,

[Lev 11:17] the owl, the cormorant, the ibis,

[Lev 11:18] the water hen, the pelican, the carrion vulture,

[Lev 11:19] the stork, the heron according to its kind, the hoopoe, and the bat

We can clearly see where the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah prohibition on foods comes from – it is plagiarized completely from the Christian Bible. But surprise, surprise – the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah both allow the eating of locusts and some grasshoppers. As mentioned before – Arabs and Pakistanis do eat locusts. They say these are permissible or halal. It is quite strange because why did they not pick on honey bees, butterflies or cockroaches and made those things halal ? Why include only the locusts and grasshoppers on their halal list ?

The answer lies in the fact that this idea about locusts and grasshoppers being permissible food is also stolen from the Bible. The Ahlul Sunnah and Shiahs copycat the Bible very closely for both their HALAL as well as their HARAM foods.

[Lev 11:21] Yet among the winged insects that go on all fours you may eat those which have legs above their feet, with which to leap on the earth.

[Lev 11:22] Of them you may eat: the locust according to its kind, the bald locust according to its kind, the cricket according to its kind, and the grasshopper according to its kind.

But the Quran has already said “ALL GOOD THINGS ARE MADE LAWFUL FOR YOU” (5:4). Hence some Chinese restaurants serve fried ants, cockroaches and even scorpion. If it is good, why not ? The Quran allows it.

Again this is just one more example of the sources of the religion of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah, which cannot be found anywhere in the teachings of the Prophet in the Quran. They are stolen from the Chistians and Jews. These teachings are therefore not part of Islam.

These Sunni and Shiah beliefs are not part of Islam. But you can find these teachings ONLY in the Christian Bible. The Sunnis and the Shiahs are actually the best Christians. Without even realising it now, the Sunnis and Shiahs are following the Christian Bible better than the Christians themsleves.

They have fallen into the trap the Christians have set for them. God has already warned the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah :

[Surah 3:69] A party of the followers of the Book desire that they should lead you astray, and they lead not astray but themselves, and they do not perceive.

But it is too late. The Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah have already been led astray by the Christians. They are no more Muslims. They are kuffar.

CHAPTER 9 : CIRCUMCISION IS FROM THE BIBLE, NOT THE QURAN.

We have been reading just how much of what is believed to be part of the religion of Ahlus Sunnah and Shiah are actually plagiarized from the Bible. Todate we have seen that NONE – absolutely NOT ONE of the religious practices of the Sunnis and the Shiahs can be found detailed inside their own Quran. Circumcision is definitely one of them. Another big one is their five daily prayers. None of these things which the Sunnis (and Shiahs) believe in is found inside the Quran.

Over the years I have been asking the Sunnis and Shiahs again and again to show me at least one thing they do in their religion which is definitely from the Quran. So far they have not been able to show me anything at all.

Even something as mundane and simple as their greeting is different from the greeting taught to us inside the Quran. The Sunnis and Shiahs say ‘Assalamu Alaikum’. This is not found in the Quran. The Quran says ‘Salamun Alaikum’ – a slight yet major difference. Do not take such differences slightly. But the point is proven – even their ‘Assalamu Alaikum’ is different from what is in their own Quran.

We have seen so far that many of their beliefs are taken from the Christian Bible. We have seen that even the Ahlul Sunnah concept of ‘aqeedah’ or faith is plagiarized from the Hebrew Bible. Even ‘aqeedah’ is a Hebrew word. In the Quran you cannot find the word ‘aqeedah’. Only derivatives like ‘uqudat’ and ‘aqada’ are mentioned but they do not carry the same concept as ‘aqeedah’ which has been plagiarized from the Bible by the Ahlul Sunnah.

Well here is one more item on the list of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah beliefs that is not found anywhere in the Quran but is stolen from the Christian Bible : Circumcision.

The Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah believe that circumcision is a part of their religious belief. They believe that the Prophet taught them to circumcise their children. The situation is so bad that the Sunnis even circumcise their female children. The mutilation of female genitalia is a serious problem in Africa and the Middle East.

The truth is God never asked the Sunnis or Shiahs to circumcise anyone. On the contrary God says that He made the human in a perfect shape:

[Surah 40:64.24] “God it is Who appointed for you the earth for a dwelling-place and the sky for a canopy, and fashioned you and perfected your shapes, and hath provided you with good things. Such is Allah, your Lord. Then blessed be Allah, the Lord of the Worlds!”

So God has made us perfect – including the foreskin on the male and the genitalia of the female. There is no need for any smart Sunnis or Shiahs to try and improve on God’s creation – even as an option, an exercise of freewill or whatever. Sunnis or anyone else have the freedom and option to cut off their foreskin or to cut off any other part of their body – but that is not part of God’s commandments. Let us be clear.

But where does the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah belief in circumcision come from ?

Once again the answer lies in the Christian Bible. Since many of the early Sunnis were converts from Christianity or Judaism they brought with them their own beliefs and systems that later became the Sunni / Shiah religion. One example is the Covenant of Circumcision from the Bible.

[Gen 17:14.13] Any uncircumcised male who is not circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin shall be cut off from his people; he has broken my covenant.” This is the covenant of circumcision.

Also the following:

[Gen 17:24.16] Abraham was ninety-nine years old when he was circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin.

[This story is found almost exactly in the Sunni hadith theology. The Sunnis say that Abraham circumcised himself with an adze - a small axe. Ouch ! Here is the false hadith : Bukhari Volume 4, Book 55, Number 575: Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle said, "Abraham did his circumcision with an adze at the age of eighty" ].

Here is the rest of the Biblical story about circumcision:

[Gen 17:25.18] And Ishmael his son was thirteen years old when he was circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin.

And here is another particularly cultish ritual from the Bible:

Exod 4:25.11] Then Zipporah took a flint and cut off her son’s foreskin, and touched Moses’ feet with it, and said, “Surely you are a bridegroom of blood to me!”

The Sunnis do a similar thing today. The circumcision of a male child is cause for much hullabaloo complete with feasting and flocking together.

So once again we see that the Ahlul Sunnah and the Shiahs are actually very good Christians. They uphold the old Biblical beliefs when almost all of Christendom has abandoned these same Biblical beliefs.

CHAPTER 10 THE SO CALLED BUKHARI HADITH IS NOT EVEN WRITTEN BY BUKHARI

The Ahlul Sunnah have been misled into becoming kuffar or disbelievers because they have abandoned the Quran. Today ask any ulema of Ahlul Sunnah simple basic questions about the Quran and they will stare at you blankly. They do not know the Quran. For example in this book so far I have quoted dozens of verses from the Quran. To the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah these verses will appear like Greek because they have never seen these verses or paid any real attention to the meanings of these verses from their own Quran.

Is it a wonder then that the Prophet will one day complain :

Surah 25.30 “And the Apostle will say: O my Lord! surely my people have taken flight away from the Quran”

Arabic : “Wa qaala rasuulu Ya Rabbi Inna kaumi ittakhazu hadha al Quraana mahjuura !! “

This is what the ulema have done. They have totally abandoned the Quran. So what do the ulema know ? They will only know some information from their fake hadith literature. But that too only in sketchy bits and pieces. They do not even know their hadith properly.

The Ahlul Sunnah say that in their pantheon of fake hadith, the writings of a fellow by the name of Imam Bukhari ‘is second only to the Quran’. They say that without this fake hadith they cannot understand the Quran – a Book which was revealed by God and which God says is ‘made easy to remember’.

The Quran repeats this particular verse four times :

[Surah 54.17] And certainly We have made the Quran easy for remembrance, but is there anyone who will TAKE HEED ?

This exact same verse is repeated in 54:22, 54:32 and 54:40. To enable mankind to take heed of the Quran, God has made the Quran easy to remember. This is actually simple logic. If the Quran is the Book of Guidance for mankind then it must be user friendly. It is really easy to remember the Quranic teachings. The reader will see how easily the writer can regurgitate appropriate verses throughout this book. Yet the writer has read the Quran from cover to cover only once in his lifetime – and that too in translation only. It just sticks to your head. But once again the ulema also reject this verse from the Quran. They do not believe that the Quran can be understood easily without their ‘second only to the Quran’ collection of fake Bukhari hadith.

But the ulema themselves have not read the Bukhari collection of fake hadith from cover to cover. If they had done so they would have discovered that while the Quran has 6,348 verses, the collection of fake Bukhari hadith tries to explain only one third or less of the 6,348 verses of the Quran. There are not enough fake Bukhari hadith to explain the whole Quran.

And the ulema do not realise that in the fake hadith of Bukhari they will come across the following words “No hadith were recorded here” as Bukhari’s ‘explanation’ for 28 surahs or chapters of the Quran. (See Sahih Bukhari, Volume 6 – Tafsir of the Quran, translation by Dr Muhammad Muhsin Khan, University Medina Al Munawwara).

In other words Bukhari himself admits that he was not able to record any hadith to explain 28 complete surahs or chapters of the Quran. That is 25 percent of the 114 surahs in the Quran. And the remaining hadith are sketchy, ridiculous and do not explain any of the verses of the Quran at all.

And yet the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah say the collection of fake Bukhari hadith is ‘second only to the Quran’. Here is a really sick description of Bukhari by an Ahlul Sunnah admirer :

“If the rich literature of Hadith is assumed a splendid collection of pearls, Al-Jami’us Sahih of Imam al-Bukhari is rightfully privileged to be called a gigantic ocean serenely flowing for the providence and safeguard of those precious pieces of magnificence. A vast, yet shore less ocean having lavishly quenched the thirst of many, it is unanimously held in the high esteem of being ‘the most authentic book after the book of Allah’ by advocates and adversaries alike’.

They speak with pride about “the dazzling level of measures adopted by Imam Bukahri in preserving the credibility of his ‘Sanad’ ”. But despite all these ridiculous comments there is no evidence that Imam Bukhari even wrote the so called hadeeth collection known as ‘Sahih Bukhari’.

The ulema themselves say that “Bukhari’s text has not come down to us in a single uniform version, but exists in several ‘narrations’ (riwayat), of which the version handed down by al-Kushaymani (d.389) on the authority of Bukhari’s pupil al-Firabri is the one most frequently accepted by the ulema”.

This is called the “Ulema Shuffle” otherwise known as double talk. They do not have a single, written collection of hadith which they can say with certainty was written by Imam Bukhari. There is no such thing. What they have are bits and pieces that have been sorted and put together over a period of almost 600 years.

The ulema realize that they stand on empty lies. To cover one lie they create a thousand more lies. To divert attention from the fact that Bukhari is not the author of a complete collection of the fake hadith that is attributed to him, the Ahlul Sunnah ulema say that at least seventy full commentaries have been written on Imam al-Bukhari’s ‘great Sahih’. How this helps prove their case is best left to the ulema to shuffle.

According to the ulema,

the most celebrated of these commentaries is “without question the Fath al-Bari (‘Victory of the Creator’) by Imam Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani, a work which was the crown both of its genre and of the Imam’s academic career. It is appreciated by the ulema for the doctrinal soundness of its author, for its complete coverage of Bukhari’s material, its mastery of the relevant Arabic sciences, the wisdom it shows in drawing lessons (fawa’id) from the hadiths it expounds, and its skill in resolving complex disputes over variant readings. For Bukhari’s text has not come down to us in a single uniform version, but exists in several ‘narrations’ (riwayat), of which the version handed down by al-Kushmayhani (d.389) on the authority of Bukhari’s pupil al-Firabri is the one most frequently accepted by the ulema”. ( see “Ibn Hajar Asqalani and his Commentary Fath al-Bari” at http://www.central-mosque.com/biographies/asqalani2.htm and www.thesaurus-islamicus.li).

By the ulema’s own admission their collection of fake Bukhari hadith is compiled from a ‘commentary’ on Bukhari by another fellow by the name of Ibnu Hajar Al Askalani.

But this fellow Ibnu Hajar never met Bukhari because according to the ulema Ibnu Hajar Askalani lived and died in 852 AH which is 596 years after Bukhari who is supposed to have lived and died in 256 AH. The ulema say Bukhari never wrote down a completed book. There were no printing presses or photocopy machines or computers available at that time. And 596 years separated Ibnu Hajar from Bukhari. So how did Ibnu Hajar write a commentary about a book that never existed ?

To overcome gaps like these the ulema say that Ibnu Hajar based his writing on the commentary of another fellow called al-Khushaymani who lived and died in 389 AH. Thus they narrow the yawning gap to 463 years. 463 years separated Ibnu Hajar al Askalani and the commentary of al Khushaymani. But even the commentary of al Khushaymani did not exist in one volume or in one collection.

But Khushaymani in turn is still separated from Bukhari by 133 years. Another gap here. To fill this gap the ulema call upon another fellow by the name of al Firabri (Muhammad ibn Yusuf ibn Matar al Firabri 231 – 320 AH) who they say was the missing link and source of the collection of fake hadith from Bukhari (died 256 AH) to Khushaymani (died 389 AH) to Ibnu Hajar (died 852 AH). The reader must carefully bear in mind that despite all these names and throughout this passage of 596 years between Bukhari and Ibnu Hajar, the ulema’s own evidence admits that there never was any complete collection of Bukhari hadith. There was and there is no such thing. The whole thing has been faked by the ulema.

Obviously the claim that Al Askalani wrote his commentary based on Kushaymani is a lie. Askalani never met Kushyamani. 463 years separated them.

The same argument goes for the seventy other commentators ? In fact the number 70 is itself mind boggling. Each of the seventy claims to have his own source. But they are all different (the so called variant readings). The seventy versions (or so they claim) have their own Kushaymanis, Fiabris and Askalanis. They have their own gaps of 400 years, 500 years, 300 years and so on. This guesswork is the basis of the religion of Ahlul Sunnah. With the Shiah it is even worse.

And this is what the ulema say about Ibn Hajar’s commentary on Bukhari hadith:

“Ibn Hajar frequently uses the Kushmayhani variant as his standard text, but gives his reasons, often in complex detail, for preferring other readings where these seem to have particular merit. In doing this he makes it clear that he is authorised, through the ijaza-system, for all the riwayat he cites”.

In other words Ibnu Hajar Askalani merely patched together HIS idea of what he thought the Sahih Bukhari should be. This is because there were variances in the available Bukhari hadeeth. It is just guesswork. This is what they have today which they call the Sahih Bukhari.

And again despite talking so much about the fake Bukhari hadith the ulema still say that ” there are few hadith which can be understood adequately without reference to the often complex debates which have taken place concerning them between the scholars. “

According to the ulema few hadith can be understood without referring to the complex debates among the ulema. This is a lark. The ulema say that the hadith explains the Quran. Now they say without their complex debates you cannot even understand the hadith.

We are expected to believe that the Almighty God who created the universe, the sky, the animals and the humans will now have to depend on the complex debates between the ulema before the human being can understand the Quran – God’s guidance for mankind. Such arrogant boasts by the ulema can only arise from extreme kuffar.

And despite talking so much, the collection of fake Bukhari hadith still says ‘No hadith were recorded here’ as the explanation for 28 surahs of the Quran. Bukhari does not have enough fake hadith to explain the Quran !

The reader is also requested to see the chapter which lists totally stupid and ridiculous hadith from Bukhari. To conclude this chapter, here is just one example :

Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 188:

Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

During the pre-lslamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a number of monkeys. They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal

sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them.

Lets just call this the Monkey hadith !

CHAPTER 11 SOME REALLY STUPID BUKHARI HADITH

Here are some really stupid Bukhari hadith. The reader must bear in mind that this stupidity is despite “Al-Jami’us Sahih of Imam al-Bukhari is rightfully privileged to be called a gigantic ocean serenely flowing for the providence and safeguard of those precious pieces of magnificence”.

Here are some of those precious pieces of magnificence :

Bukhari Volume 1, Book 9, Number 490: Narrated ‘Aisha: The things which annul the prayers were mentioned before me. They said, “Prayer is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman.” I said, “You have made us (i.e. women) dogs. I saw the Prophet praying while I used to lie in my bed between him and the Qibla. Whenever I was in need of something, I would slip away. for I disliked to face him.”

So women are like dogs and donkeys.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 54, Number 537: Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said “If a house fly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it (in the drink), for one of its wings has a disease and the other has the cure for the disease.”

Perhaps this is why the Ahlul Sunnah will continue to buy pharmaceutical products from the West. Dunking flies in your tea spreads disease.

Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 5: Narrated ‘Ata: We presented ourselves along with Ibn ‘Abbas at the funeral procession of Maimuna at a place called Sarif. Ibn ‘Abbas said, “This is the wife of the Prophet so when you lift her bier, do not Jerk it or shake it much, but walk smoothly because the Prophet had nine wives and he used to observe the night turns with eight of them, and for one of them there was no night turn.”

This is a mystery.

Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 6: Narrated Anas: The Prophet used to go round (have sexual relations with) all his wives in one night, and he had nine wives.

But the other hadith just said someone missed a turn.

Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 7: Narrated Said bin Jubair: Ibn ‘Abbas asked me, “Are you married?” I replied, “No.” He said, “Marry, for the best person of this (Muslim) nation (i.e., Muhammad) of all other Muslims, had the largest number of wives.”

The more wives one has the better Muslim one becomes. Hmmm…

Mahmood bin Rabe narrates, “I still remember when I was five years old,

the Holy Prophet rinsed his mouth and then spat the water into mine”

(Bukhari Kitabul Ilm vol.2, hadith 77).

Perhaps an adjunct to the ‘dip the fly in your tea’ cure for diseases.

The (Exalted) Messenger used to visit all nine of his wives every night

(Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:52).

The Holy Messenger used to have intercourse with all of his wives in

one hour of the day and night (without taking a bath) and these (wives)

were eleven.

The Holy Prophet had the (sexual) power of 30 men (Bukhari, Book

of Bath 1:189).

The Prophet said that the best man amongst his followers is the one

who has the greatest number of wives (Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:52).

The Holy Prophet asked, “Who will buy this slave from me?” Hazrat

Naeem bought him for 800 Darham (Bukhari, Kitabul Ikrah p.669).

The hadith Bukhari has made the Prophet a slave trader !

The sun rises between the two antlers of Satan (Bukhari 2:134).

And we thought the sun rose over the Land of the Rising Sun !

After the fall of Khyber, people described the beauty of Safia Bint

Hui, the new bride of a slain enemy soldier. The Prophet chose her for

himself. On the way to Madina he stopped and had intercourse with her.

His companions did not know if she was a wife or a concubine. Later, a

veil was drawn between her and the men-folk and they came to know that

she was a wife (Bukhari, Book of Sales and Book of Nikah 3:59).

From slave trading to sleeping with 9 or 11 women in one night to sleeping with the prisoners of war ! Indeed Bukhari makes the Prophet of Islam to be a real superhero and a gentleman !

The Prophet said, “Bad luck, misfortune and doom can exist in a wife, a

home and a horse” (Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:60).

“After my time, the greatest tribulation for men will be women”

(Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:61).

I saw that most of those entering the gate of hellfire were women

(Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:97).

Again the slanderous statements against women. They were like dogs and donkeys. Now they are like horses too. And of course the women will entere the hellfire in large numbers.

Fitna (tribulation) is in the East (Bukhari, Book of Talaq 3:132).

Maybe Bukhari’s compass was broken ?

Aisha said to the Prophet, “Ah! My head is bursting.” He said, “I

wish it did.” Aisha responded: “You want me to die so that you can

spend the next night with another wife” (Bukhari, Book of Medicine, vol.3).

Maybe Aishah was the woman who did not get her turn that particular night ?

A man inquired, “We earn income from these bondwomen, (other narratives

mention prostitution) so can we do coitus interruptus with them?” The

Prophet said, “There is no sin in doing that” (Bukhari Kitabul Qadr 3:543).

Some people got sick in Madina. The Prophet advised them to drink

camel’s urine and milk. After they became well, they killed a shepherd.

The Prophet ordered that their hands and feet be chopped off and their

eyes enucleated. They were laid on burning sand. When they asked for

water it was denied them. So much so that they tasted sand until they

died (Bukhari Kitabul Mahrabain and Kitabut Tib p.254).

More organic medical prescriptions. From flies to camels urine.

Seeing a black woman in a dream is the sign of an oncoming epidemic

(Bukhari Kitabul Ta’abir).

Does this mean black people must dream about white people too ?

The Prophet’s wives awoke late one morning. He said, “Many women who

are dressed up in this world will be raised unclothed in the Hereafter”

(Bukhari Kitabul Fatan 3:718).

Another mystery.

The Prophet used to become very restless and frightened whenever he saw

the sky overcast (Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:213).

Prophet was also superstitious ?

The hellfire complained to Allah, “One part of me is eating the other

part.” So, the hellfire was allowed two breaths – one in summer and

one in winter. That is how you see the change of seasons (Bukhari,

Beginning of Creation 2:231).

Only in the Arab countries. The deserts are hot like hell anyway.

Azan, (the call to prayer), puts Satan to flight, expelling gas as he

runs away (Bukhari Beginning of Creation 2:237).

Satan should not eat so much Jalapeno beans.

Satan rests at night in your noses (Bukhari, Beginning of Creation

2:241).

And that is why when your nose itches at night you should not scratch.

A rooster sees angels, and a donkey sees Satan (Bukhari, Beginning of

Creation 2:213).

That’s why donkeys are donkeys and roosters are roosters.

Rats are the lost tribe of Israel because they drink not the camel’s

milk, but drink goat’s milk (Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:244).

But goat’s milk is so expensive. Rats have expensive tastes.

Five animals are sinful, so kill them even in Makkah: rat, scorpion,

eagle, crow, and a biting dog (Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:245).

What about smiling dogs ?

The Prophet ordered the killing of dogs (Bukhari, Beginning of Creation

2:247).

What would you expect – after slave trading and sleeping with prisoners of war.

Woman was created from the rib so she will always remain crooked.

Leave her crooked (Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:251).

Maimoona said that she gazed at the Prophet taking a bath after

intercourse, until she saw him wash his private parts (Bukhari, The Book of

Bath 1:193).

Before the Prophet the men never washed their private parts ?

If the Prophet wanted to have intercourse with a menstruating wife, he

ordered her to tie a loincloth even though the menstruation would be at

its peak. Then he had intercourse. Whoever has concocted this hadith

adds a contrary statement: Aisha said, “No one of you has as much

control over his desire as the Prophet had!” (Bukhari The Book on Menstruation

1:98, chapter 207).

Abu Hurairah narrates that the Prophet said, “I was praying. Satan

came in front of me and tried to force me to break my prayers. Allah gave

me control over him and I threw him down. I thought of tying him with

a pillar so that you could see him in the morning (Bukhari 1:469,

chapter 766).

The Quran says ‘The satan and his tribe can see you from places while you cannot see them’ Surah 7:27.

The Messenger of Allah addressed his wife Safia as “O’ you bald-headed

perished one!” (Bukhari, Kitab Talaq p.143).

Umro bin Maimoon reported, “I saw a monkey surrounded by a swarm of

other monkeys. He had committed adultery with a female monkey. So, all

monkeys stoned him to death. I cast stones, too.” A variation of this

hadith reports, “The female monkey had been lying down with a

middle-aged male when a young male came and gestured with his eye. The female slowly pulled her hand away from under the head of the middle-aged monkey and tiptoed away from him. Then she committed adultery with the young monkey. The older monkey got wind of what had happened so he yelled

and gathered around him all monkeys in the vicinity. They stoned both

(the adulterers) to death!” (Bukhari 2:261).

More monkey jurisprudence for the Ahlul Sunnah.

When a woman refuses to come to her husband’s bed, angels curse her

until she returns (Bukhari, Book of Nikah p.96).

Hadith #185 narrates that once the Holy Prophet asked for a bowl of

water. He washed his hands and face in it. Then he rinsed his mouth in

it and after that ordered Abu Musa and Bilal to drink the used

water!

The Book of Bath #246: Abu Salma and the brother of Aisha went to Aisha

to learn about the bath after sexual intercourse. She procured a

container of water and took a bath. There was a veil between them and her.

It was Home Science. You have to teach the younger generation how to wash your private parts.

The Holy Prophet passed a group of women. He said to them, “Ladies,

give alms, because I have seen you burning in hell in great numbers.”

When the women asked the reason for it, he said:

v “You women curse too much!”

v “You are ungrateful to your husbands.”

v “In spite of being deficient in intellect as well as in religion,

you are capable of prevailing over a man of wisdom; you are a creation

the like of which has never been seen.”

v “Is not the testimony of a woman one half that of a man? This is

the measure of deficiency of your intellect!”

v “And mind you, when a woman has her periods she is not allowed to

pray or to fast. This is the measure of your deficiency in religion.”

CHAPTER 12 AHLUL SUNNAH AND SHIAH ULEMA PREACH SLAVERY FROM THE CHRISTIAN BIBLE

It is a fact that until today slavery is freely practised in the Ahlul Sunnah countries like Saudi Arabia and the Sudan. They have learned this from the Christian Bible.

Of course the larger definition of slavery would put almost the whole of the

Third World into the class of slavery. There is much slavery in India,

Indonesia, Pakistan and the Phillipines. This is institutionalised

slavery on a national scale sustained by illiteracy, ignorance, the caste

system in Pakistan and India and the consequent poverty. Some may call it

‘marginalisation’ or other fancy names but it is still slavery. President Nelson Mandela, a true Muslim, calls it the slavery of poverty.

But in the Ahlul Sunnah theology, in their so called fake hadeeth and fake sunnah (may God save us from them) they have clear cut references to slavery. This is an evil satanic belief that the Ahlul Sunnah have inherited from their Biblical fathers.

For example the famous book of Ahlul Sunnah jurisprudence ie the Al Muwatta of Imam Malik has a detailed chapter on SLAVES. Imam Malik tells the Ahlul Sunnah how to buy and sell slaves, how a father can bequeath female slaves to his son (if the father has had sex with the female slave, then the son cannot have sex with them – they can only do housework !!!) and other such satanic teachings.

The Quran tells all human beings (and not just the Muslims) to free the

slaves. The Quran lists the freeing of slaves as a part of righteousness.

[Surah 2:177] It is not righteousness that ye turn your faces to the

East and the West; but righteous is he who believeth in Allah and the Last

Day and the angels and the Scripture and the prophets; and giveth wealth,

for love of Him, to kinsfolk and to orphans and the needy and the wayfarer

and to those who ask, and to set slaves free; and observeth proper worship

and payeth the poor-due. And those who keep their treaty when they make one,

and the patient in tribulation and adversity and time of stress. Such are

they who are sincere. Such are the God-fearing.

This commandment applies to everyone – and not just to the Muslims. Assuming

you are someone who considers himself a Muslim and assuming you had some

slaves, after reading the Quranic command above you would immediately have to set the slaves free. Otherwise you cannot call yourself a Muslim. You are not righteous. End of slavery. End of discussion.

But the satanic Biblical copycats like Imam Malik can write detailed chapters

on how a father and son team can go about having sexual intercourse with

their female slaves. That is the satanic Ahlul Sunnah ulema for you, folks.

In another example, the Quran enjoins charity (sadaqah) and even details

the purposes of the sadaqah charity – among which is the freeing of the slaves.

[Surah 9:60] “The charities (sadaqah) are only for the poor and the needy,

and those who collect them, and those whose hearts are to be reconciled, and

to free the slaves and the debtors, and for the cause of Allah, and (for)

the wayfarer; a duty imposed by Allah. Allah is Knower, Wise.”

The purpose of sadaqah or charity is also to free the slaves. It is

ridiculous to say that the Prophet allowed slavery (as has been suggested by the satanic ulema ) when the Quran enjoins the collection of alms to free those same slaves.

But the same does not hold for the Ahlul Sunnah or the Shiahs. They allow the

capture of slaves, the keeping of slaves, the trading of slaves, sex with

slaves, inheriting slaves from father to son and many other kinds of satanic

evil. That is the evil of the Ahlul Sunnah for you.

The following is another commandment in the Quran. Again this applies to all

human beings and not just to the Muslims:

[an-Nur 24:33] And let those who cannot find a match keep chaste till Allah

give them independence by His grace. And such of your slaves as seek a

writing (of emancipation), write it for them if ye are aware of aught of

good in them, and bestow upon them of the wealth of Allah which He hath bestowed upon you. Force not your slave-girls to whoredom that ye may seek enjoyment of the life of the world, if they would preserve their chastity. And if one force them, then (unto them), after their compulsion, lo! Allah will be Forgiving, Merciful.

If anyone has a slave and the slave asks for their freedom, then we must give them their freedom in writing (IMMEDIATELY) and also give them a share of your money. Not only is the Quran a liberating document, it is sometimes a

little socialistic too. Try suggesting this to the Saudis, the Pakistanis, the Sudanese and the Indians etc.

But where do the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah learn this terrible evil about slavery ?

You guessed it folks. It comes straight from the Bible.

[Lev 25:46.20] You may bequeath them to your sons after you, to inherit as a

possession for ever; you may make slaves of them, but over your brethren the

people of Israel you shall not rule, one over another, with harshness.

There is a frighteningly similar suggestion by Imam Malik in his textbook

the Al Muwatta. The Bible also has more suggestions on what to do with

slaves

[Lev 25:44.18] As for your male and female slaves whom you may have: you may buy male and female slaves from among the nations that are round about you.

Biblical teaching indeed. You can make slaves of other races around you.

Again this is also practised by the Saudis until today. Their belief is that

they can make slaves of other races. Until today the common derogatory term for Pakistani contract workers in Saudi Arabia is ‘abd’ or ‘abdul’ which means

slave. This is Ahlul Sunnah slavery for you.

[Lev 22:10] “An outsider shall not eat of a holy thing. A sojourner of the

priest’s or a hired servant shall not eat of a holy thing;

[Lev 22:11] but if a priest buys a slave as his property for money, the

slave may eat of it; and those that are born in his house may eat of his

food.

Here the Bible even allows the priests to buy and keep slaves. No doubt the

ulema of Ahlul Sunnah have borrowed this idea too.

[Exod 21:32.6] If the ox gores a slave, male or female, the owner shall give

to their master thirty shekels of silver, and the ox shall be stoned

Hence the Bible suggests the value of a slave ie thirty shekels of silver.

Right minded christians ignore such teachings of the Bible today (or do they

?) It is too shameful. Satanic. But not the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah. The ulema of Ahlul Sunnah are the best Christians in the whole world. They have abandoned the Quran.

CHAPTER 13 AHLUL SUNNAH UPHOLD BIBLICAL PREJUDICE AGAINST MENSTRUATING WOMEN

In the religion of Ahlul Sunnah women occupy a low second class position in

society. In the Shiah religion, women occupy an even lower rung in the

second class citizenship sweepstakes. Why ? This is because the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiahs have adopted really cruel Biblical teachings which aim to put down

the women in society.

We know the prescription of the headcover or ‘hijaab’ for women which is an entirely Christian invention found in the Bible in the 1st Book of Corinthians, Chapter 11. Mother Theresa was the best example of a hijaab wearing woman.

These teachings are not found anywhere in the Quran. They are not part of

the Prophet’s teachings. These are falsehoods stolen or plagiarised from

the Christian Bible and then passed off as part of the religion of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah.

Another example by which the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiahs put down their women is by telling the women that they are unclean when the women are menstruating. The degree of torture on the women varies between the various sects and subsects of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah.

For example, the Ahlul Sunnah say that when a woman is menstruating she

cannot pray. A menstruating woman cannot go to the mosque. A menstruating

woman cannot touch the Quran. A menstruating woman cannot fast. A

menstruating woman cannot perform the haj.

Similarly when a Sunni woman gives birth, she is considered spiritually

unclean for varying periods of time usually forty days, 30 days or whatever

– depending on which Sunni sect she belongs to. She has many restrictions imposed on her during this time. Such is the false religion of Ahlul Sunnah.

You can never find these false ideas in the Prophet’s true teachings which

is the Quran. But where do these strange ideas come from ? Yes sir/madam

you guessed it. It all comes from the Christian Bible.

[Lev 12:2] “Say to the people of Israel, If a woman conceives, and bears a

male child, then she shall be unclean seven days; as at the time of her

menstruation, she shall be unclean.

[Lev 12:4] Then she shall continue for thirty-three days in the blood of her

purifying; she shall not touch any hallowed thing, nor come into the

sanctuary, until the days of her purifying are completed.

Seven plus thirty three = forty days of uncleanness, exactly the same

period of uncleanness prescribed by the Ahlul Sunnah for post delivery mothers.

[Lev 12:5] But if she bears a female child, then she shall be unclean two

weeks, as in her menstruation; and she shall continue in the blood of her

purifying for sixty-six days.

The discrimination against women starts early. The period of uncleanness if

a girl child is born is 80 days.

The Quran does address the issue of the women’s menses. Lets look at the

following beautiful and simple teaching of the Quran :

[al-Baqarah 2:222] They question thee (O Prophet) concerning menstruation.

Say: It is an illness, so let women alone at such times and go not in unto

them till they are cleansed. And when they have purified themselves, then go

in unto them as Allah hath enjoined upon you. Truly Allah loveth those who

turn unto Him, and loveth those who have a care for cleanness.

The only teaching here in the Quran is that during their menstruation men should not approach women for sex (“and go not in unto them till they are cleansed”) because they are unclean. Why ? Because they are having their period. After they are clean, men can resume their relations with women ( And when they have purified themselves, then go in unto them as Allah hath enjoined upon you).

It does not take a rocket scientist to figure this out. There is a multi

billion dollar female hygiene products market that caters exclusively for women’s

hygiene. Everyone knows that. Even the non Muslims know this. But having

their periods does not prevent women from driving cars, teaching at school,

breaking the Olympic record, sailing around the world or cooking for

their Sunni husbands.

The false teachings about menstruation are nothing more than a fabrication

by their Ahlul Sunnah ulema to impose Biblical teachings upon the Ahlul Sunnah.

CHAPTER 14 MORE BIBLICAL BELIEFS OF THE AHLUL SUNNAH – GRAVEN IMAGES

The false religion of Ahlul Sunnah believes that one should not make statues of animals and humans. They say that the act of having statues of humans and animals will lead to idol worship. They also disallow the making of woodcarvings,

moulds and also the drawing or painting of pictures that have animals or

human forms.

Of course with the advent of newspapers, television, videos etc it is a

little ridiculous for the Ahlul Sunnah to insist on such foolish beliefs. But the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah have learnt the value of publicity. They will not mind being photographed by the newspapers or being filmed for the television news coverage. It means more money for them. The Ahlul Sunnah ulema of Saudi Arabia have come up with a simple solution to get around the problem of having their ‘graven images’ recorded on photographs. They say that a photograph is just like a mirror that reflects a human beings face. It is just that in a photograph, the image stays. So it is alright.

First they make the silly little rules. Then they find their own even more silly loopholes to break their own silly little rules.

Again you will not find such silly beliefs in the teachings of the Prophet

which is the Quran. But you will most definitely find such teachings in the Christian Bible. The Christian Bible calls it the worship of ‘graven images’. It is found in the following verses of the Bible:

[Deut 4:16] beware lest you act corruptly by making a graven image for

yourselves, in the form of any figure, the likeness of male or female,

[Deut 4:14] And the LORD commanded me at that time to teach you statutes and ordinances, that you might do them in the land which you are going over to

possess.

[Deut 4:15] “Therefore take good heed to yourselves. Since you saw no form

on the day that the LORD spoke to you at Horeb out of the midst of the fire,

[Deut 4:16] beware lest you act corruptly by making a graven image for

yourselves, in the form of any figure, the likeness of male or female,

[Deut 4:17] the likeness of any beast that is on the earth, the likeness of

any winged bird that flies in the air,

[Deut 4:18] the likeness of anything that creeps on the ground, the likeness

of any fish that is in the water under the earth.

So the Christians and their religious cousins the Ahlul Sunnah or the Sunnis are not allowed to make graven images of birds, animals, fish, humans and other beings. This is known as Ahlul Sunnah Christianity.

The strange thing is that the Christians do not follow their own Bible’s

prohibitions about ‘Graven Images’ anymore. Hence the Catholic churches are full of statues, cherubs, angels, Mary Mother of — and so on. But the Ahlul Sunnah have taken this Biblical teachings to greater heights. Their so called ‘Ahlul Sunnah’ art has been reduced to nothing more than arabic calligraphy (there is no Chinese or Indian ‘Ahlul Sunnah’ calligraphy) and making geometric patterns because the Ahlul Sunnah have been obeying strictly the Biblical prohibitions on creating ‘Graven Images’ of humans and animals.

But according to the teachings of the Prophet this should not be the case.

No less a person than a Prophet, a Messenger of God by the name of Solomon

was actively engaged in the making of statues. This is what the Quran says:

[Surah 34:12] And unto Solomon (We gave) the wind, whereof the morning

course was a month’s journey and the evening course a month’s journey, and

We caused the fount of copper to gush forth for him, and (We gave him)

certain of the jinn who worked before him by permission of his Lord. And

such of them as deviated from Our command, them We caused to taste the

punishment of flaming Fire.

[Surah 34:13] They made for him what he willed: buildings and STATUES,

basins like wells and boilers built into the ground. Give thanks, O House of

David! Few of My bondmen are thankful.

God gave the Prophet Solomon control over the elements and also control over

the jinns (genies). And Solomon commandeered the genies to make for him

“buildings and STATUES, basins like wells and boilers built into the ground”.

And for all this Solomon (who was David’s heir) was thankful to his God.

“Give thanks, O House of David! Few of My bondmen are thankful”.

Hence there is nothing wrong in creating statues, artforms or paintings that

have human and animal forms in them. Once again this is just another

example of the Biblical teachings that have been absorbed by the Ahlul Sunnah.

CHAPTER 15 MORE AHLUL SUNNAH STUFF FROM THE BIBLE – BEARDS

The Ahlul Sunnah and Shiahs are fond of growing beards. They say that this is a good thing to do for men because wearing a beard brings rewards from God and also blessings. This is a lie. The Ahlul Sunnah and Shias also shave off their mustache.

Here are some false hadith from Bukhari that talk about growing beards :

Bukhari Book 002, Number 0501:

Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Trim closely the moustache, and grow beard, and thus act against the fire-worshippers.

Bukhari Book 002, Number 0502:

‘A’isha reported: The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Ten are the acts according to fitra: clipping the moustache, letting the beard grow, using the tooth-stick, snuffing water in the nose, cutting the nails, washing the finger joints, plucking the hair under the armpits, shaving the pubes and cleaning one’s private parts with water. The narrator said: I have forgotten the tenth, but it may have been rinsing the mouth

The Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah also have a hadith on crotch shaving. Good hygiene is welcome but there is nothing religious about shaving. There are no magical blessings to be gained by growing beards or shaving one’s crotch.

This is another false idea the Ahlul Sunnah have stolen from the Bible.

Book of Numbers 8:5-7:

“5 Then the LORD said to Moses, 6 ‘Now set the Levites apart from the rest of the people of Israel and make them ceremonially clean. 7 Do this by sprinkling them with the water of purification. And have them shave their entire body and wash their clothing. Then they will be ceremonially clean. . . .’”

New Living Translation, emphasis added

The hadith on beard and crotch-shaving are NOT THE WORD OF ALLAH. They are innovations borrowed from the Christian Bible.

The result is that a lot of Sunnis and Shiahs therefore look exactly like the Amish Christian brothers who also grow their beard and shave off their mustaches.

In Afghanistan this silly Sunni cult behaviour was used by the mad Taleban to enforce racist policies in the country. Afghanistan consists of the Asiatic mongolian type races like the Uzbeks, Tajiks etc. It also has a sizeable number of the Aryan type races like the Pushtuns. The Taleban were the Pushtun type people (Aryans).

There are groups in the north who are mongoloid Asiatics. Asiatics do not have much beards or facial hair. This is how God has created the different kinds of people on this earth. (Red Indians and Eskimos for example have almost no

facial hair).

So the Pushtuns came out with a ruling that according to Sunnism, all men must grow a full beard. People who cannot grow a full beard are considered as

inferior – they can be punished. You can never be a religious leader in Afghanistan if you don’t have a full beard. And during the time of the Taleban if you were not a religious leader – you could not do anything nothing in Afghanistan. So the Asiatics could not do anything in Afghanistan.

With this simple rule the Taleban could discriminate against the Asiatic races in Afghanistan. The Quran does not say anything at all about growing beards or trimming moustaches. So where do these strange Sunni ideas about beards come from ?

You guessed it folks – it comes from the Bible. You cannot ever find such weird cultish behaviour in the Quran. These are all Biblical ideas stolen from the Christian Bible. This is Ahlul Sunnah Christianity. Here are the Bible teachings about beards :

[Lev 19:27] You shall not round off the hair on your temples or mar the edges of your beard.

[Lev 21:5.16] They shall not make tonsures upon their heads, nor shave off the edges of their beards, nor make any cuttings in their flesh.

You shall not even cut your beard. A lot of Rasputin types running around. Then there is also a story of some men who were forcefully shaved.

[2nd Samuel 10:5] When it was told David, he sent to meet them, for the men were greatly ashamed. And the king said, “Remain at Jericho until your beards have grown, and then return.”

Here it is a shame not to have a beard. A bit of Taleban Afghanistan here.

To the Christians today these are not issues at all. The Christians have long ago decided NOT to listen to their Bible (otherwise there would be a bunch of

beardos running around – probably wearing robes as well)

Few of the Christians today really follow their own Bible. But the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah wear their beards just like the Bible tells them. They have stolen these strange ideas from the Bible. You can never find this in the Quran. The Ahlul Sunnahs and the Shiahs are the best Christians in the world today.

CHAPTER 16 : EVEN THE ‘AMEN’ HAS TO BE STOLEN FROM THE BIBLE

To continue with the Sources of the Religion of Ahlus Sunnah and Shiah, in the Sunni religion, the people are taught to say Amen at the end of their du’a or prayers. They also say Amen at the end of reciting the Surah Fatiha which is the first chapter of the Quran and which is recited in their five daily prayers. This is a short chapter of seven verses only. The Sunnis and Shiahs will recite the last seventh verse of this chapter as follows :

‘Waladholleen Aameen’.

Firstly there is NO ‘Ameen’ at the end of Surah Fatiha. The ulema have tried to improve on God’s revelation. They are smarter than God so they have added the Ameen at the end of the chapter.

Also at the end of every du’a or prayer the people are required to say Ameen behind the imam or priest. Again this is not the practise of the Prophet. Believe me I have searched the whole Quran and there is NOT even once where Ameen is found in the Quran. Again my point is proven THAT THERE IS NOT ONE THING THAT THE SUNNIS AND SHIAHS DO IN THEIR RELIGION WHICH IS TAKEN EXACTLY FROM THE QURAN.

In this case of the Amen, it is simply not found in the Quran at all.

Where do these ideas come from ? If Allah did not reveal this Amen to the Prophet where did the ulema get this idea about the Amen ? Again the answer lies in the Christian Bible. Here it is. See for yourself where the Sunnis and Shiahs have plagiarised their Amen. It is from the Bible.

Bible, Book of Deuteronomy 27 : 15 – 26

15 “Cursed is the man who carves an image or casts an idol-a thing detestable to the LORD , the work of the craftsman’s hands-and sets it up in secret.”